嘉宾访谈·中文精读

史蒂夫·希尔顿与斯宾塞·普拉特:修复加州、降低油价、选票舞弊与加州共和党

Steve Hilton & Spencer Pratt: Fixing California, Cheaper Gas, Ballot Fraud & CA Republicans

史蒂夫·希尔顿谈一党制与监管膨胀如何拖累加州,斯宾塞·普拉特谈洛杉矶选战、选票收集和 Palisades 水库问题。

官方音频00:00 / --:--

本期章节点时间可跳到音频对应位置

  1. 0:00史蒂夫·希尔顿做客好友团!
  2. 3:53一党执政如何搞垮该州、监管臃肿及谁真正写法律
  3. 12:09胜利之路:可说服的选民、生活成本主张及反对贝塞拉的理由
  4. 21:46斯宾塞·普拉特做客:穿透人心的信息与翻转的洛杉矶选战
  5. 26:58近距离看这座城市:公园、小企业及规则真正奖励谁
  6. 36:54选票收集、选民 ID 及制度是被操纵还是只是合法
  7. 47:13帕利塞兹:空水库、起诉州政府及斯宾塞下一步做什么
中文精读由 AI 基于原始节目改写,非官方翻译,可能存在偏差或错误;观点归属与表述以原音频与官方文稿为准。说明

加州州长竞选里有一个共和党人,还是个在英国出生、在硅谷创过业的移民。距离投票日还剩七周,他把和对手的差距从 30 个百分点追到了 8 个。

他叫史蒂夫·希尔顿(Steve Hilton),2012 年从英国搬到加州,住得离查马斯不远。本周他上了 All-In。和他一起来的还有另一个人:今年在洛杉矶靠一堆视频刷屏、差点把市长卡伦·巴斯拉下马的斯宾塞·普拉特(Spencer Pratt)。

两个人的说法几乎一模一样:加州这套系统已经坏了,而它坏的方式,是让守规矩的人被惩罚。

加州对美国的意义,相当于美国对世界的意义

希尔顿在节目开场先讲了一段他自己相信的话。

加州是美国最大的州,也是最富的州。更准确地说,它作为地球上最富有、最重要的国家都不为过。加州对美国的意义,就相当于美国对世界的意义。(史蒂夫·希尔顿)

他说自己是被这个州吸引来的。一个多世纪以来,这里从洛杉矶起步做出了娱乐业,做出了全球最强的科技生态,还做出了全美第一的农业。创新、能量、野心、那种带点叛逆的劲头,都是他眼里美国最本质的东西。

但接下来他给的是另一面。

一党执政 16 年,加州把一手好牌打成了全国最差

希尔顿列了一串数字:全美最高的贫困率、最高的失业率、最高的生活成本,还有最高的房价。中位房价接近 100 万美元,个人收入中位数只有 6.5 万美元。

《首席执行杂志》每年调查全美商业领袖,加州连续十几年在商业环境排名里排 50 个州的第 50 名。它排在最末尾,每个州都比它强。

希尔顿把原因归到一党独大上:16 年里民主党拿下了全部 8 个全州民选职位、州议会的三分之二多数、每一个大县、每一座大城市,以及 6 比 1 的州最高法院。他说这种结构在历史上出现过很多次,不分左右,最后都会变成一个封闭的、只顾自己的精英圈子,忘了对其他人负有责任,只盯着自己的意识形态和金主。

他还讲了一个细节。去年萨克拉门托通过了 1118 条法案,他让人把它们全打印出来,摞起来有他两个那么高。

这些法案没人会读完。你觉得加文·纽森在签字之前会读完吗?不会。这些法案是按控制这个流程的狭窄利益集团的需求写的,对他们有利,对所有人有害。(史蒂夫·希尔顿)

加州目前的法规数量超过 42 万条。他宣布的目标是:第一个任期结束时砍到 20 万条以下,让加州和其他州重新有可比性。

另一个数字更刺眼:在加州创业,90% 的概率会陷入诉讼。希尔顿把责任指向工会和出庭律师这些长期主导州议会的力量。

查马斯顺势提了一个他一直挂在嘴上的判断:所谓"机器"起作用的地方,未必在选举层面,更多在任命层面定人。选票收割的组织、竞选动员的组织、工会、资金,全部串在一个闭环里,外面的人很难插进去。

希尔顿没有反驳,他说自己这套竞选叙事就叫"人民对机器"。

从落后 30 个点到 8 个点:他的胜选路径是一道算术题

杰森把现实摆到桌面上:Polymarket 上希尔顿的胜率是 5%,各家民调从落后 8 个点到 20 个点都有。选民的极化程度是,共和党人中约 90% 已经归队,独立选民只拿到 30%,民主党人不到 10%。

9 月 30 日他有一场和贝塞拉的辩论。杰森问:你打算在那场辩论里做什么。

希尔顿给的是自家内部民调:33% 铁定投他,41% 铁定投贝塞拉,剩下 26% 还没定。这 26% 里大部分人以前投过民主党,但不算死忠,是可以说服的。

这批人是谁?绝大多数是没有大学学历的普通工薪阶层,财务上已经到了临界点,唯一关心的是生活成本。所以他的竞选信息从第一天起就只讲一件事:怎么让日子便宜下来。

初选之夜的差距是 30 个百分点。之后依次是 25、18、14,最新的民调是 8。

杰森追问了一个更根本的问题:加州有很多理性的人,明明觉得现状不对,却觉得不投民主党像是一种背叛,于是要么不投票,要么进去找个 D 打勾。如果一直这样,是不是非得撞到某个财务事件才会重置?

希尔顿说,以他跑遍 58 个县、办了几百场市政厅的见闻,现在已经是谷底了。人们跟他说的第一句话几乎一字不差:"你必须赢。"9 月 11 日他去萨克拉门托参加纪念活动,坐在后排,有四五个陌生人走过来跟他说:"我一辈子投民主党,今年投你。"

他还听到生意人反复说的一句话:如果 11 月没有改变,我们就走。他说过去几年企业离开加州还只是流出,如果这次没有任何制衡出现,那会变成一场踩踏。

他的方案:油价打到 3 美元,前 15 万收入免州税

希尔顿在节目里把政策讲得很具体。

第一,砍浪费。加州政府预算在过去十年翻了一倍,同期有 200 万人离开,而所有指标都在恶化。他要取消高铁,政府编制减少 10%,效率提升 5%,停止给那些让无家可归问题变得更糟的非营利组织拨款。省下来的钱用来减州所得税,竞选片里说的是前 10 万美元免税,他在节目里把数字讲到前 15 万美元免州税。顺带一句,连凯蒂·波特都同意这个方向。

第二,能源。他的说法是,加州现在把石油运到地球另一边去炼,一边宣称在应对气候变化,一边实际上把排放推高了。他主张用加州本地的能源,废掉过时的法规和藏在油价里的税。

具体藏了多少?杰森问是不是排放标准或者汽油配方的问题,希尔顿说都不是。

是隐藏的税。低碳燃料标准、总量控制与投资计划,加起来就是每加仑 1.5 美元。这笔钱去哪了?总量控制与投资计划的钱,就是高铁的资金来源。(史蒂夫·希尔顿)

他的目标是把 6 美元的油价打到 3 美元,向其他州看齐。

第三,车辆注册费。加州人现在注册一辆车常常要掏 800 到 1000 美元,多数州不到 100 美元。他的办法是取消车管所(DMV),把注册费封顶在每车每年 73 美元的固定费率。

为什么不该投贝塞拉

希尔顿对贝塞拉的攻击没有绕弯子,他引用的全是民主党自己人的话。前国家安全顾问、拜登国内政策负责人苏珊·赖斯和他共事过四年,据希尔顿的说法,赖斯对贝塞拉的评价只有一个词:蠢货。她还补了一句更粗的话,现场几个人笑出了声。

另一位拜登内阁成员的说法是:关于贝塞拉你需要知道的一件事,运营一个大型行政机构并不是他的技能包。

如果你觉得纽森之后不可能更糟,我送你两个词:哈维尔·贝塞拉。他就是机器想要的那种人,一个木偶,会照着工会、出庭律师和活动分子的意思办事。他比纽森更糟。(史蒂夫·希尔顿)

(注:加州总检察长的正确拼写是泽维尔·贝塞拉,Xavier Becerra。)

杰森问萨克斯,共和党为什么在加州投入这么少。萨克斯的回答是,过去没有希尔顿这么好的候选人,而且这场选举必须围绕加州本身,不能变成全国政治的代理战,否则拿不到独立选民。

他顺手引了彼得·蒂尔(Peter Thiel)多年前的一个观察:硅谷对加州来说像一种资源诅咒。它产生的财富和税收太多,以至于州政府不需要好好治理也能运转。一党独大能维持这么久,原因之一就在这里。

希尔顿接过这个话头,讲了贝塞拉初选前上 CNN 的一幕。主持人直接问:无家可归、最高的贫困率、最高的失业率、糟糕的生活成本,你会做什么不一样的事?

他说,我们是世界第四大经济体,很多人还是喜欢来迪士尼乐园和我们的海滩。所以事情应该还是走对了。(史蒂夫·希尔顿转述)

希尔顿的反驳是,"世界第四大经济体"这个数字是 GDP,里面包含了政府自身的规模,而政府在过去十年翻了一倍。疫情以来加州的私营部门净新增就业基本是零。这个经济体极度失衡,靠一个不创造大量就业的行业撑着。席间有人补了一句:如果 40 号提案通过,连这根支柱都保不住。

斯宾塞·普拉特:真正穿透的是内容,AI 只是载体

斯宾塞·普拉特是作为"另一位跑了漂亮选战的人"被请上台的。他今年以独立身份竞选洛杉矶市长,做了一堆传播度极高的视频,其中一部分是 AI 生成的。

杰森问他,这些视频是谁做的,是不是有个秘密群聊,怎么让希尔顿也复制一遍。

普拉特的回答是:AI 只是其中一块,真正起作用的是视频里的观点。

我做的事情很简单,就是上所有能上的平台,开始讲真话。真话本身创造了这场草根运动。人们受够了被欺骗。我在视频里说的,和希尔顿在线下说的是同一件事。(斯宾塞·普拉特)

他强调,投他票的人大部分是民主党。他给出的原因是:

如果洛杉矶那 20 万注册共和党人真的出来投票,我会 100% 赢,把那些投给妮西亚·拉曼和巴斯的超级瘾君子全打趴下。所以现在要做的就是让人出来投票,坐在那里抱怨系统没有任何用处。(斯宾塞·普拉特)

他的选举过程被杰森要求复盘。普拉特的版本是:开票当晚他在 Don Antonio's 庆祝,对手妮西亚·拉曼在镜头前哭,因为当时他领先 10 个百分点。然后"政治史上数学上最不可能的事情"发生了:原本排第三的候选人开始每天一点点地涨,最后刚好超过了他,也超过了排第一的民主党人。她多出来的那部分选票,来自 43000 张邮寄选票。

洛杉矶市中心这一带到底有多少赤身裸体的吸毒僵尸?他们说是 43000。我不是说他们作弊,因为这个系统……(斯宾塞·普拉特)

杰森当场打断:"你刚刚就是说他们作弊了。"

合法,但不正当:加州的选票收割是怎么运作的

这一段是全场最激烈的部分,值得把每个人的立场分开写。

普拉特谈的其实是规则设计。他很少直接指认谁伪造了选票,他指认的是:这套规则把某种行为变成了合法动作。他说 2018 年前后加州立法允许了选票收割,你可以组织人去公寓楼里挨家挨户敲门,帮住户填好选票,再统一收走。他引用民主社会主义者(DSA)的组织方式,说他们的志愿者会反复上门三次,直到对方不耐烦地把选票交出来。他说这在投票站附近属于违法的选举活动,在居民楼里却完全合法。

他讲了一个技术细节,解释为什么打官司也没用。选票送到计票中心后,工作人员会把选票和信封分开。信封上有认证签名,选票上没有。所以即便他怀疑某一片区域出了问题,也没法把那些选票和签名对应起来,链条断在这里,重新计票只是把同一批选票再数一遍。

所以我不能说他们作弊。按加州的法律,这套做法算合法。这就是我说的机器,它的设计让外部的人无法介入,除非你也愿意下场去玩同一套游戏。(斯宾塞·普拉特)

他还举了一个更好验证的点:加州的选民名册长期不清洗,搬走的、去世的人还在上面。洛杉矶市中心有一片空停车场,每年会收到几百张寄来的选票。

几位主持人在这里没有放过他。杰森直接问:你的意思是,你输掉选举是因为舞弊?是还是不是?

普拉特的回答是:"没有证据的话,我说不是。"他补了一句,如果他有证据,他现在就是市长了。他也否认自己发过"舞弊者偷走了选举"这样的话,说自己当时的原话是 20 万共和党人没出来投票。

杰森接着逼问:那按你的说法,得有成千上万张假选票。

这些选票都是真的,只是被合法地收割了。你不能按张付钱给收割的人,但你可以雇人去做这件事。这就是法条写成的样子。(斯宾塞·普拉特)

弗里德伯格追问,那有没有任何一个被反复敲门的居民投诉过被骚扰。普拉特没有给出具体案例。

杰森最后把话说清楚了自己的位置:他支持选民身份证,登机要证件,投票要证件很合理,但他认为普拉特始终没有指出具体发生在哪里的一次犯罪。萨克斯则明确补了一句:这场选举应该围绕加州本身,不要把它变成全国政治的代理战。

这一段的分歧点很清楚。普拉特描述的是规则本身的合法性漏洞,而主持人要的是可起诉的具体违法行为。两件事都成立,但都不足以单独证明对方错。

一条 2018 年的法律,是怎么弄死一家开了 14 年的鞋店的

希尔顿在台上讲了两段实地见闻,这是整期节目里最有说服力的部分,因为它是可验证的。

第一段在麦克阿瑟公园附近。兰格熟食店(Langer's Deli)开了将近八十年,几年前老板 Norm Langer 一度想关门,因为周边太乱,是顾客把它救了下来。希尔顿上周二上午十点半再去,公园里随处可见抽快克、注射毒品、被芬太尼压弯了腰的人,几十个,在洛杉矶市中心的大晴天里。

为什么警力和联邦检察官都在抓,问题还在?

因为每天有四家非营利组织到场,发快克烟管、发针头、发毒品。谁在付钱?是我们。纳税人在资助这些机构。(史蒂夫·希尔顿)

他补充说,联邦检察官比尔·埃萨伊利(Bill Essayli)抓到的其中一个人,一边在发针头,一边在卖毒品。

第二段更直接。洛杉矶南部一对拉丁裔夫妇开了一家鞋店,开了 14 年,店里一尘不染,税、许可证、电费一样不少。他们请希尔顿出来看两段人行道:整条街上全是卖鞋、卖衣服、卖 T 恤的摊贩,不交税、不交租、不办执照。

希尔顿问这些摊贩什么时候来的。答案是最近六七年,和疫情无关。

2018 年萨克拉门托通过了一条法律,在全州范围内把街头摆摊合法化。市里管不了,县里也管不了。旁边的小吃摊把油直接倒进下水道,老鼠到处都是,全都合法。(史蒂夫·希尔顿)

他把这归结成一句话:在今天的加州,做对事的人被惩罚,做错事的人被奖励。这套逻辑被倒过来了,而这才是这场选举真正要翻转的东西。

杰森在这里说了一句公道话:不管什么政治立场,如果这些描述属实,这是他能听到的最愚蠢的政策安排之一,而且需要把二三十个这样的具体案例反复讲出来,才有可能撼动这套固化的体系。

普拉特又补了一组数字:全州大约有 5 万个流动食品摊贩,大多数连 21 美元的许可证都不办,但市议会给了他们 50 万美元去买正规餐车。与此同时,他所在的帕利萨德斯水库盖板维修只要 20 万美元,没人修,他的镇子烧了。

帕利萨德斯的火:水库是空的,隔离带只要 50 万美元

普拉特的家、他父母的家、他所有邻居的房子都在那场火里没了。他这次竞选市长,按他自己的说法,就是"最后一次孤注一掷"。

他给的出现场信息量很大。

一是水库。烧掉他房子的那片区域旁边那座水库,至今还是空的。他家对面那座他从没想过会出事的水库,也是空的。现在帕利萨德斯靠一根从托潘加一路接过来的软管供水,那根管子穿过重新长起来的枯死灌木。

二是隔离带。他找过负责清理灌木的负责人,问在帕利萨德斯周围清出 300 码宽的防火隔离带要花多少钱,答案是不到 50 万美元,能保住几十亿美元的资产。清理没做,因为那些枯死灌木长在州立公园里,属于受保护的植物,包括一种叫 milk vetch 的豆科植物。有 LADWP 因为在一根倒下的电线杆周围砍了灌木被罚 100 万美元。

我家后院连着纽森的州立公园,枯灌木一直长进来。我要是砍了,那是受保护的植物,等着收罚单吧。(斯宾塞·普拉特)

三是诉讼。他牵头做的是一个大规模侵权诉讼,原告约一万人,被告是州立公园、洛杉矶市和 LADWP,理由是过失。他讲的时间线是:跨年夜帕利萨德斯起过一场 8 英亩的火,被扑灭了,但州立公园没有按规定看守余火,让它一直闷烧到 1 月 6 日、7 日那场已知的强风事件。他说已经有消防员吹哨人证实当时山坡上有闷烧的炭火,而在对州立公园员工的取证里,对方拍下的山坡冒烟照片已经在案。

问他们为什么不管,他们的回答是:我们不是消防员。(斯宾塞·普拉特引述证词)

杰森问他,把这段失职公之于众、让更多人知道,是不是比赔偿本身更重要的动机。普拉特说一开始确实是这样,他做视频是为了帮社区。直到他意识到巴斯会自动连任,他打电话给里克·卡鲁索问要不要选,对方说不选,他就在当天决定自己上。

他对"没有经验"这个质疑的回应是:洛杉矶需要的市长,就是一个执行法律的人。巴斯和拉曼都不打算执行法律,因为执法不好看。

他接下来要做什么

杰森说斯宾塞的表达能力太适合做真人秀了。斯宾塞的回答是,现在最糟的就是所有人都在做人设,都在想评论区会说什么。

你去看任何一个政客,他们就是一个做得不好的 TikTok 网红。(斯宾塞·普拉特)

他说自己现在反而对这群人威胁更大,因为他有两年时间可以扎进社区里做内容。他给出的三个方向是:继续做讲真话的内容,并且把范围从洛杉矶扩到纽约和全国;第二个是把游说资源换成基础设施,比如把 Skid Row 拿出来给数据中心,条件是对方帮洛杉矶重铺水管、重做电网,顺便把芬太尼成瘾者培训成电工;第三个是四年后带着一套更完整的票仓组织方案再选一次。

希尔顿在他离开前说了最后一段话。他说这场选举要拦住那些疯狂的事,但加州能做的事还有很多,他当天发布了一份"加州十座新城"的计划。人才在这里,能量在这里。

我们可以很快再次变成那个大家来建公司、建房子、建伟大东西的地方。我们拥有变得伟大所需要的一切,只缺一个像样的州长。很快我们也会有。(史蒂夫·希尔顿)

  • 把民调和预测市场分开看。Polymarket 给希尔顿 5%,而民调差距已经从 30 个点缩到 8 个点。9 月 30 日那场和贝塞拉的辩论是下一个可以检验的节点,如果差距继续收窄,5% 这个定价就明显偏低。
  • 关注加州政策对实际决策的影响。前 15 万美元免州税、取消 DMV、砍掉 22 万条法规,这些目前都还是竞选承诺。真正要盯的是 40 号提案这类可能落地的税收变化。有加州业务或团队的人,值得提前把注册地、股权结构和办公地点做一次推演。
  • 做地面生意的人,先把本州的行业法规查一遍。2018 年那条把街头摆摊全州合法化的法律,直接改变了一家人行道鞋店的生死,市和县都无权干预。联邦法反而排在后面,因为真正决定你能不能开门的是州法。
  • 选票收割比拼的是组织能力。普拉特说法里最有价值的部分在执行层:谁能反复上门三次、谁能收走信封,谁就掌握结果。你可以不同意他的结论,但他描述的组织方法本身是公开信息,DSA 的网站上就有。
  • 山火风险已经是一个可以定价的资产问题。保险公司退出、隔离带成本 50 万美元对几十亿美元资产、水库盖板 20 万美元对一座镇子,这些数字比任何气候讨论都更能说明风险该怎么算。在相关地区持有房产的人,先查清楚自己那片区域的水源和防火带维护责任归谁。
  • 做内容的人,斯宾塞这个案例的结论是反过来的。他反复强调,视频里的观点才是关键,AI 只是载体。同一批视频换成空洞的观点,不会有人转发。工具已经平等化了,剩下的是你敢不敢把立场讲清楚。
文稿由本站用语音识别模型(Whisper,基于官方发布音频)机器转写,可能有识别错误,没有说话人标注;人名与数字请以音频为准。
(00:00:00) a candidate for the governor of California, who is extremely unique in a number of ways. First of all, he's a Republican. And second, he's a Brit. Welcome to the program, Steve Hilton. It's a joke. I mean, what are these Democrats doing? We already have the highest taxes in the country. Your first hundred grand tax free. Even Katie Porter agrees with that. Prior to that, he was in Silicon Valley as a tech entrepreneur. People are so sick of the nonsense. Is everything twice as good when they've doubled the budget? Of course not. California means to America what America means to the world. Please welcome Steve Hilton. Wake up. Wake up, buddy. Let's go. (00:00:53) Hi. Wake up, California. We have seven weeks to save our state. Are you ready? Are we going to do it? We got seven weeks. That's all. But we can do it. Seven weeks. There's a lot of people here who aren't from California. Well, actually, who's from California? Raise your hand. Some applause. Who's a resident from Cali? I think there's a lot of people from California. You're from California, yeah. But help explain why California is so important. California is not just the biggest state, the richest state and the richest, most important country on earth. As I said just then, and you saw, California means to America what America (00:01:42) means to the world. I'm an immigrant, moved here in 2012. Neighbors with Chamath. So how about that? I picked a good spot. And I was inspired by this state. It represents for me and for so many people over the century plus that this state has been growing and leading in so many ways, the absolute essence of what we love about America. Innovation and energy and ambition and hustle and that kind of rebel spirit. That's why we've created so many industries here that have completely transformed the world starting right here in Los Angeles over a century ago, the entertainment industry, obviously tech that you're all so familiar with, but also our great ag industry. We have the (00:02:30) leading agriculture industry in the world. We've been in so many different fields. We have led the world. That's why it's so important. We don't let California go down any further. What is the state of the state then? This state, I'm afraid, despite all our incredible advantages, and of course we still have them, the things that the people in charge haven't managed yet to ruin, our incredible natural beauty and the weather and the energy that you see in our startup communities, the best innovation ecosystem in the world, great universities. But look at the facts. We've had 16 years of one party in control. Today in California, we have the highest poverty rate in the country, the highest unemployment rate, the highest cost of living by far. Look at how we have housing cost (00:03:16) the highest in the country. That's why people are leaving. They are leaving. Millions of people leaving California, this beautiful place. You got two right here. And exactly. You've got now Chief Executive Magazine has ranked California in its annual survey of business leaders for more than a decade, 50th out of 50 for business climate. It's just incredible when you look at the range of issues where the policies that we've been subjected to have just created the worst outcomes, not just bad in comparison to other states, the worst out of every state. So look, we know how you measure the outcome, but go back a few layers and think about just the root causes. Democrats have run this state for a long time. Democrats used to be sort of like peace and love and (00:04:05) permissiveness and openness. So just corral that for us because I think this is a place now that has become rules on top of rules on top of rules. How did a group of people who basically were just like peace and love and leave us alone become the rule police? It's exactly right. This is what happens with one party rule, actually. And you see that in history. Whether it's from the right or the left, it always ends up with a kind of insular, self-regarding elite that just forgets about their responsibility to everyone else and just gets obsessed with their own ideology, their internal motivations, whoever their interest groups are that they represent. And by the (00:04:52) way, in Sacramento, we have one of the most corrupt systems anywhere in the country in terms of the power of the donors to the politicians who make the decisions, the unions, the trial lawyers. That's why we have the worst litigation risk anywhere in the country. You run a business in California, you start a business in California, 90% chance you're going to end up in litigation. So it's just a complete mess when you get one party rules. Now, 16 years, the Democrats have run everything. All eight statewide elected positions, the state legislature with a two-thirds majority, every big county, every big city, the state Supreme Court with a 6-1 Democrat-appointed majority. So this is what happens. The rules get piled up because every year they pass legislation that just adds to the burden and the bloat. (00:05:40) Last year, the Sacramento legislature passed 1,118 bills. So we printed them out. Very productive. Very productive. Exactly. Productivity going up there. We're going to be doing this year's in Sacramento on Thursday. We printed it all out. I mean, I'm not that tall, but it was twice my height. Okay? Nobody's reading this. You think Gavin Newsom is reading all this before signing it? No. It's written in the interests of the narrow groups that control that process, and it benefits them, but hurts everybody else. That's why we have by far the highest regulatory blow. That's why one of the things I'm announcing today, actually, is that we're going to cut the number of regulations in (00:06:27) California from where we are today, which is over 420,000, by the end of my first term to under 200,000, which makes us competitive with the rest of the country. Now, but if there's a narrow interest group that controls the legislature, is it not also the case that that narrow interest group controls the machinery that I would argue doesn't necessarily elect people but appoints people, which makes it difficult for rational outsiders to have a shot at a true kind of democratic campaign? That they own the ballot harvesting machines? That they own the campaigning machines? That they get everyone in the state behind them? All the unions? All the votes? Everything is aligned under one controlled mechanism, and therefore, it has, at this point, gotten so far down the road that it is impenetrable, and we cannot actually break in. (00:07:15) Well, it's definitely the case that we have this very powerful and corruptly funded machine that's running every... I agree with that. In fact, one of the ways that we're telling the story of this campaign is the people versus the machine. That's what this is. But there's a majority of Californians who want change. That's clear from every single poll. When we started the general election part of this campaign, if you look at the primary results on primary night in California in the governor's race, if you add up myself and the other Republican, that's 35%. I got 25%, the other Republican, 10%. You add up all the Democrats, 65%. That's a 30-point gap. The first poll came out. It was a 25-point gap. I know a lot of people were discouraged by that, but we were just beginning (00:08:01) our campaign. And look what's happened just in the last couple of months. From a 30-point gap on primary night to 25 points, 18 points, 14 points, the latest poll, an 8-point gap. We are showing that people want change in this state, and I just don't accept that we have to put up with this. And your only choice is to put up with all this nonsense and bloat and tax and cost and all the hassles of living here or trying to work here. Your only choice is to put up with it or leave. That's, if I may say so, as a new American citizen, that's a very un-American attitude, that it can't be done, that we can't make change happen. We've got to fight for it. There are plenty of people who believe that the state needs (00:08:48) change. We just have to show in the next seven weeks that change really is possible. But why do you... If we get more votes, we'll win. It's pretty simple. Steve, why do you think that people feel that it would be almost a betrayal, though, even if they want change to not, you know, vote Democrat? Why is that there seems to be in California, at least as I've lived it, a lot of very rational people who feel sort of out of place. They're not quite sure whether they should be a Republican. They're made to feel guilty for not being completely a Democrat. So they either don't vote or they just go in and they find the D and check the box. And so all of the insanity sort of compounds. And if that continues to happen, don't we need to hit rock bottom? Like, isn't there going to be some financial event or otherwise (00:09:35) that needs to happen to reset? I've got to tell you, I think it's pretty rock bottom now in terms of what it's actually like to live here. I mean, I travel this state. I've been to every one of our 58 counties. No candidate's done that in a very long time. We've done hundreds of events, town halls up and down the state. Every single day, I see just the pain and the struggle in people's eyes to live here. I mean, look, you try and own a home here. We used to have the highest rate of home ownership in the country in California and the most affordable housing. Now, the median house price in California California is nearly a million dollars. The median salary in California for an individual, 65,000. I mean, it's just completely broken. And people are broken by this. And they are desperate (00:10:20) for change. The number one thing that people say to me when I'm out and about and where they come up to in the airport or the street, wherever we are at my events, it's not good luck, hope you do well. There's an intensity this year. The number one, it's almost word for word. This is what everyone says to me. I've heard it even here backstage. You have to win. There's an intensity about it this year. And I think that this is the year we can really do that. Just to your point about Democrats, that's true that you've had this habit of voting Democrat, even though the results have been increasingly disappointing. But I think that's changing. I'm just, I don't know, Friday, 9-11. I was at the 9-11 Memorial event in Sacramento. Not there participating. I was just there to show (00:11:06) my respects. I took my seat in the back. People came up to me, take pictures and so on, as they often do. Just there, just randomly in a pretty small event, I had a number of people, it must have been four or five people, just randomly, all almost said the same word for word thing. I'm a lifelong Democrat, but I'm voting for you this year. I think we have reached that point. And that's why I'm saying we got to wake up. Because the other thing I hear all the time from business leaders or business owners every single day is, if you don't make it in November, we're out. And I'm just serious about this. If we think that it's bad now, I think that the exodus of business (00:11:54) that we've seen from California in the last couple of years, if we don't show some change here and some balance in our system, it's going to turn into a stampede for the exits. It really is. I think this is a now or never election for California. Let's talk about the metrics and the path to victory here. Polymarket has you at 5% chance of winning. The actual polls have you as close as 8% to 20%. And it's incredibly polarized. You have 90% or 89% of Republican voters. Okay, mission accomplished. You've only got 30% of independents work to do. And then if you look at Democrats, you've got less than 10%. So you've captured the Republicans making some headway with independents, but you're not making, aside from the anecdotal (00:12:41) stories you're telling us, massive headway with these Democrats yet. But you have one debate, September 30th versus Becerra. What do you have to do in that debate to change the narrative and to shake this up? What's the plan? No, it's a great question. It's the question in many ways. And I'll just give you our metric and our numbers, which is, you know, we wanted to see what is the pathway to victory for real. So this is not us cooking the numbers at all. This is a poll that we took right at the beginning of the campaign when it's clear that it was myself and Javier Becerra. And these are the numbers. 33% solidly with me, 41% solidly with Becerra, 26% up for grabs. Now, most of that 26% have voted Democrat before, (00:13:32) but they are not committed Democrats. They are open to persuasion. And then you ask, well, who are those people and what are they focused on? Overwhelmingly, non-college educated, regular working people in California who are at breaking point financially. And their overwhelming interest is practical things to help with the cost of living. And that's what our campaign's been all about. Not just in response to that poll, but since the beginning of the campaign. And I can tell you what it is very simply. To reduce the bloat and the waste in our budget, they've doubled the budget of the state of California in the last 10 years with 2 million people having left the state. Everything's gotten worse. We're going to cancel high-speed rail. We're going to have a 10% headcount (00:14:18) reduction in the government, 5% efficiency, say many other things, stop the funding of these nonprofits that are making homelessness worse. And that all adds up to enough money for us to cut state income tax. Your first 150 grand tax-free, no state income tax. That puts thousands of dollars in the pockets of regular working people. Secondly, we're going to have a sensible energy policy. Instead of shipping oil halfway around the world, pretending that we're doing something about climate change, even though we're actually increasing emissions by doing that, we're going to use California energy resources. And that means, and get rid of the ridiculous outdated regulations and the hidden taxes on gas. So we can deal with the number one thing that's hurting working people (00:15:05) every day, which is gas prices. Instead of $6 gas, we can get towards $3 gas in California, like you have in other states right now. By getting rid of the emissions premium, or getting rid of the cleaning of the gasoline. No, it's not that at all. It's the hidden taxes, the low, all these things, the low carbon fuel standard, the cap and invest program. That's about $1.50 on the gas price right there. Guess where that money goes? The cap and invest program. That's what's funding high-speed rail. I mean, you dig into all these things in California, they are gouging you on every single possible thing they can. The announcement we made last week is going to help regular working people. To register your car or truck in California, hundreds of dollars, many people paying $800, $900 over $1,000. In most other states, it's under $100. It's another (00:15:53) hidden tax. Well, we are going to cap vehicle registration at the flat registration rate of $73 per vehicle per year by abolishing the DMV, which is a symbol of the, a symbol of this, this, this absolutely ridiculous, bloated, nanny state bureaucracy that is driving everyone crazy and driving up everyone's costs. You just need to send an outsider to Sacramento that wants to shake up this system that's clearly broken. Why shouldn't people vote for Becerra? What is the flaw in this person's character? Well, I mean, the short answer is, I'm going to quote the people who worked with him. He touts the fact that he's got so much experience. Yeah, he's a 36-year career politician. Let's look (00:16:41) at the verdict, not of other Republicans, but Democrats who work with him. Susan Rice, President Biden's head of domestic policy, was President Obama's national security, head of national security advisor. She worked with him for four years. Her description, Becerra is a, quote, idiot. Okay, so the reason not to vote for him is he's an idiot. By the way, she also said, and I don't know quite what she meant by this, he's a bitch-ass. So make of that what you will. Sounds like he's pretty qualified for a role to run California. Exactly. Maybe it's just... He's a bitch-ass idiot. A bitch-ass idiot. Give him the keys. Another one, right, from the Biden cabinet said, the thing about Javier you need to know is running a large executive agency is not exactly his skill set. I mean, this is just... If you don't think it can get worse after Gavin Newsom, (00:17:32) I have two words for you. Javier Becerra. He is exactly what the machine, to your point, wants, a puppet who will do the bidding of the unions and the trial lawyers and all these activists that have ruined the business climate in California, made everything more expensive. He'll just go along with it. He's even worse than Newsom. I want to get you in, Sachs, here. Why haven't the Republicans invested in California more? Because you're coming in, Steve, I think, with a lack of infrastructure, correct? And you obviously speak for all Republicans. So why haven't... Well... On this podcast... We haven't had a candidate as good as Steve. So we needed the right candidate, right? So can you get some more money from President Trump? He just called in. But when he calls in this afternoon, (00:18:21) can we get him some more funds here? He seems like he's got a puncher shot. I mean, if you put this energy into the debate, maybe you take this guy out. How gone is California, Sachs? California... I mean, look, what we need is for this election to be about the state, not about national politics, right? And Steve is focused on the problems here. Let's not bring in the rest of the country because we have to appeal to the independence. And Steve is right. The state's really broken. We have all these budget deficits for no reason. We're gifted with so many unbelievable assets. We have Silicon Valley. By the way, you know, one observation Peter Till made years ago was that Silicon Valley was like a resource curse for the state of California because it generates so much wealth and taxes that they don't need a good government here. And that's how you get a one-party state. (00:19:08) Can I just sort of pick up on that, if I may? So if you actually... There was a brilliant moment, I mean, a depressing moment with Becerra just before the primary where he was on CNN and he was asked that question. And to be fair, the host said, look, we got some problems here. Homelessness, highest poverty rate, highest unemployment rate, terrible cost of living. What do you think really would you have done differently? What needs to change from a policy point of view? He literally said, well, you know, we're the fourth biggest economy in the world and many people still love coming to Disneyland and our beaches. So things must be going right. And the point about the resource curse is exactly right. This is what you hear from Gavin Newsom the whole time. Fourth biggest economy in the world. That's mainly driven by the fact that we have this incredibly successful sector that's (00:19:56) generating a lot of revenue, but not creating a lot of jobs. It's a very imbalanced economy. The other reason that we have the fourth biggest economy in the world is that that number is the GDP number. It includes the size of the government. They've doubled the size of the government in the last 10 years. The figure for net job, private sector job creation since the pandemic in California is basically zero. It's a disaster economically, but we're kept afloat by that one sector. A lot of this home. And by the way, if Prop 40 passes, I think that'll no longer be true. It's going. Exactly. That's why, honestly, wake up everybody. This is a really serious moment. Hey, Friedberg, we had an idea. You have another guest here who might be great to join. Steve. Yeah. So, Steve, you know, you've obviously, I think, been running a great campaign. (00:20:46) Someone else ran a great campaign here in LA, and we were hoping you'd be okay to have him come out early and maybe join you for a little bit. Yeah. I don't know who you could be thinking of. Let's find out. All right. Let's have a look. He's trying to make the campaign a reality show. No, no, my dear. You made my life a show when you burned my town down. You know his face. You know his name. His name is Spencer Pratt. A media entrepreneur. To be clear, I never wanted to run for any political office or have anything to do with politicians. Like to see him do well, he's a character. Mayor Bass and I are definitely not working together. I blame this person for burning my house and my parents' house and my town and all my neighbors down. I'm only running for mayor to do one last (00:21:33) Hail Mary. Please welcome Spencer Pratt. Wow. You're popular. Popular with this crowd. Nice to see you. All right. Welcome. Steve, Spencer, Spencer, Steve. How are you? You guys have some things in common. I mean, how hard is it to break the machine in California, Spencer? He keeps calling it a machine. I like to call it a corrupt criminal mafia cartel. You know, machine is when you're a candidate. You have to call it a machine. These are criminals. It's that simple. They launder all of our tax money to increase people dying on our streets. (00:22:22) And then they say, oh, he's a Republican candidate. You can't vote for him. Let's let people keep dying on our sidewalks because we have compassion. So no, those are criminals, actually. Spencer. The criminal machine. Spencer, you did something worthy of a round of applause. Let's go. Spencer, you did something extraordinary in terms of an independent candidate getting massive earned media with these videos, AI generated. But they were incredibly deft at communicating messages. Who made them? Did you direct them? Was this like a covert group chat? And then how can we get Steve to do these? I am. We're both the same team. (00:23:08) Okay. Tell us what's going on. Yeah. And the impact it had because we saw them. Initially, what kicked off was just the truth. That's all I did. I went out on as many platforms and I just started saying the truth. And what that created was a grassroots movement. And to reference a machine, it became a machine that creative people across the country could throw their genius or their ideas into it. I wouldn't say it was the AI that worked. I think it was a piece of a lot of things that were working. Same with Steve. You know, AI is a piece of it. You know, people just expect these things now. But for me, it's the message that was cutting through. It wasn't the AI. It was what was in these videos. (00:23:55) I was saying in real life, just as Steve is saying in real life, people are tired of being lied to. People want the truth. I didn't set out to be, as the president would call me, a big MAGA guy or the guy with the mojo for the Republicans. I set out as a guy whose town burned down, my neighbors burned down. I just wanted somebody speaking the truth. And that wasn't political to me. And so that's why most of the people that voted for me were Democrats. I would have won 100% and beat all the super meth addicts that voted for Nithya Rahman and Bass if the 200,000 Republicans that are registered in Los Angeles actually voted. And that's what we need people to do for Steve. People need to vote. We've got to this idea with the mail-in ballots and all the alleged voter fraud and the non-alleged voter fraud that we can't beat this system. (00:24:47) But people just need to show up. One of the great things the president did say was the too big to rig. And not only is that work, I've talked to a lot of people behind the scenes. You can beat these margins of cheating with voting. Steve, can you, I mean, Spencer, can you actually explain what happened in your election? Because for the casual observer, it seemed like there was a period you were winning and then something happened. And then a lot of votes showed up at the end. And then there was a, so for those of us that were not steeped in what happened in LA, can you just give us a summary of what happened? Yeah, I was at Don Antonio's celebrating while my opponent Nithya Raman from the commie DSA was crying on camera because she was losing by 10%. And then mathematically, the most impossible thing in the history of politics happened. (00:25:36) The third place candidate started slowly each day winning. But of course they'll say, oh, yes, but Democrats, they vote by mail-in ballots. But this Democrat was against the current mayor, who's also a Democrat. And the third place candidate somehow bypassed not just me, but the first place Democratic candidate to get just enough votes to beat me. And here's my favorite part of the 43,000 votes she got in those mail-in ballots. How many naked drug addict zombies are there in downtown LA in this area? 43,000. There's really about 100,000, but they say 43,000. So, again, I'm not saying they cheated because the system... (00:26:21) I think you just did, guys. But hold on a second. You just did say they cheated. Okay. The system is designed so what we think is cheating is not cheating. Because, ready for this? Mail-in ballots. The witness can sign with a smiley face, an X. This witness can be a witness to... They're not allowed to check. This witness can be a witness to 43,000 ballots. All right, guys, listen. These two are only here because Steve's got to go to another thing. But I want to see if Spencer and Steve... Maybe have you guys met or talked much about his campaign? And is there anything you can share about the experience here that you've just went through? Can I... I just want to say one thing to underline what Spencer said at the beginning, which is the deep thing that's going on here. About what's happening with our money. (00:27:06) For everyone who put their hand up and said, I'm here in California. So you'll know this story. You've seen it. You've been there. You told the story. I was at Langer's the other week. Langer's Deli right by MacArthur Park. And we crossed the... Nearly 80 years in business. A couple of years ago, Norm Langer wanted to shut it down because the chaos all around. In LA, the customers rallied around. It's still in business. And the chaos is back, even though you've got a DA now in LA that's cracking down on the drugs and the crime. And you've got a US attorney, Bill Asaley, good friend of ours, who's doing a great job trying to go after the criminal gangs and the cartels. But what's actually happening? This was a Tuesday morning last week, about 10.30, mid-morning. (00:27:52) He said, come and see what's happening. It's like whack-a-mole because you go out into MacArthur Park, 10.30 on a Tuesday morning. Every single place you look, you've got the people you described. You've got crack pipes, people smoking crack, injecting drugs, folded over with fentanyl. In the middle of a beautiful sunny day in the center of LA. Dozens and dozens of people. Why? Because every single day, four non-profits show up handing out crack pipes, handing out needles, handing out drugs. Who's paying for that? You are. We are. We are paying these people. What do you mean we're paying for drugs? Because the taxpayers are funding the non-profits who are handing out the crack pipes, the needles, and the drugs. No, what drugs are we talking about? (00:28:38) Fentanyl. They hand out fentanyl needles, a black Jeep. I pay taxes. They take the taxes. They buy fentanyl and then they give it to... No, they buy the needles. And interestingly enough, one of these people from the NGOs that was handing out the needles, Bill Assaylee also caught him selling the drugs too. So technically you're not buying the drugs, but the people that were paying for the needles happened to also be selling the drugs on the side. Can I just tell, I'm going to be... It's called the side quest in our industry. I just want to say one other story that really captured... Side hustle. And then I'll head out. I just want to tell this other story that kept... This story that we've just had experience of and one other that actually captures me in a deeper way what this election is all about. (00:29:24) Just a couple of days before that experience in MacArthur Park, there's this Latino couple wanting me to come and see their business. In South Central LA, it's not Skid Row, but it's pretty rough. And it's the usual squalor that I'm afraid we're used to in this city because they don't know how to run the place. But in the middle of all that squalor, this beautiful little store, they run a store. It's a shoe store. And they've been running it 14 years. Latino couple. We went in. We were talking. They gave me all the usual things that I'm very familiar with. The taxes. The ridiculous bureaucracy. The permits that get more complicated and costly every year. The electric bill, etc. But that's not why we wanted you to come here. Come with me. They took me outside. You walk along. We went for a walk. (00:30:10) Two city blocks could have gone even further. Every single part of the sidewalk. Street vendors. You think illegal street vendors. What are they selling? Shoes. An apparel. T-shirts. Just the entire sidewalk. This 14-year business. A lovely little local business. Everything spotless. Everything clean. Exactly what we would want to see is going out of business. Because you've got people there that are not paying tax. Not paying electric. Not paying rent. Not complying with any licensing. And then I said to the guy, when did all this happen? When did it start? Has this been here? All the time you've been here? No. It's the last six or seven years. I said, is it something to do with the pandemic? No. I looked into it. (00:30:55) Eight years ago, in 2018, they passed a bill in Sacramento to legalize street vending in California. Across the state. Cities can't do anything about it. Counties can't do anything about it. You've got, and langurs. You've got food stands there that are pouring their grease into the drain right in front of their store. You've got rats. You've got all of it legalized. And what does it tell you when you take that into account? And then what you see in MacArthur Park with the drugs. You know what you guys should do? Can I just tell you what the lesson is from this? That we've become a state where if you do the right thing, you're punished. And if you do the wrong thing, you're rewarded. That is upside down. But that's the story beneath everything. And that's what we need to turn around. (00:31:41) That's what this election is actually about. No, I really think it's important for you guys to be able to tell the stories of these specific laws. Because it doesn't matter your political persuasion. When you hear that, if it is as accurate as you say, it's functionally one of the stupidest things I've ever heard. And if there's a 20 or 30 of these examples, it's important for people to know this. Because that's the only thing that cracks this entrenched system. Because I do think that these belief systems are very difficult to turn over. And you have to just hit them with facts over and over. But these things are insane. If as accurate as you said, Steve, it's insane. The craziest part about this. So they say there's 50,000 food vendors. (00:32:26) 50,000. And they made it more affordable. So most of them don't even have the permit that costs $21. But our city council, green lit. And they already did this. They gave these food vendors $500,000 to give them an actual cart. My town burned down because Mayor Bass and the LADWP didn't repair the reservoir cover that was $200,000. So they have money to have... A lot of these people are not tax-paying citizens. They have the money to give them $500,000 for food cards. But they can't get... The Pacific Palisades is paying most of the taxes for the whole city. They can't get the reservoir cover. What does it say, Spencer, if this city elects Karen Bass again? (00:33:15) And what does it say in terms of lessons about your campaign that you can't beat somebody that incompetent? I mean, we're up against dumb and dumber. I would say they're less dumb than picking this socialist, communist, alleged terrorist supporter, Nithya Raman. So we're in a position where it's either worse or worse. And at least with Mayor Bass, we know, oh, she only burns down one town every four years. Right. How many does Nithya Raman burn down? We'll find out. Yeah. So, no, it's... I hate to say this. Let's hope we don't. Yes. What can I say? It's not a complete joke, right? What you just said. So we launched our general election campaign after the primary in Boyle Heights, East L.A. Why? (00:34:00) Because that was the site of another fire where Karen Bass was out of town. Incredible. The warehouse fire that burned for a week. She was out of town for that one as well. And you had... It was a warehouse. You had 85 million pounds of rotting meat that was left there for five weeks. This is a working class Latino neighborhood in L.A. It's just... We launched our campaign that the press wasn't very happy because you have flies everywhere. The whole place stinks. You have rats, medieval diseases. This is in the second city of America. I mean, it's just what these people have done is actually unforgivable. We've got to kick these people out this year. We really do. Spencer, before Steve leaves, any advice for him? (00:34:49) I feel like Steve doesn't need my advice. He's doing incredible. What he just needs to continue doing, and he does it, is appealing because you're never going to win as a Republican in California. But what he's running is common sense. And the message is, you know, for the people that are like, I'm voting for Basara. What does Biden call him? I think we say Basara. I think we say Basara. We're going to take Basara from Karen Bass and apply it there. These people think they're voting because he says, I'm going to fight president. The president is gone in two years. So then what? You're just going to have another entrenched, terrible person running the state. And don't worry. The whole entire state is run by Democrats. If there's one registered Republican, it's okay. (00:35:35) So I would say the message is Steve is about common sense, and he just wants our tax money to stop being stolen. And he wants kids being able to go back to parks. These aren't a Republican or Democrat. It's just a non-communist message. So you're going to stay with us for a bit. Steve, I know you've got to run. Any last words? Anything you want to say before you head out? I just want to tell everyone that actually it's not just about stopping the crazy stuff that we've been talking about. There's so much we can do in this amazing state. I've got a plan here that we're publishing today. Ten new cities for California. We've got so much opportunity here. If we just have some common sense, we get rid of these insane regulations and lawsuits and fees and taxes. (00:36:23) The talent is here. The energy is here. We can once again be the place where people are coming to build amazing businesses and companies and houses and the great things we built in the heyday of California. We can be all that again and very, very quickly because we've got everything we need to be truly magnificent again, except a good governor. But very soon we'll have that as well. Thank you very much. Thanks for being here. Thank you. What's your favorite viral Spencer Pratt video? I know mine. It's we have the money. It's just being stolen. You remember that one? I do. I mean, what I loved about running so much is it was finally a way to channel all of my anger. (00:37:11) And it was it was so therapeutic. This feels so good. But yeah, Steve's incredible. I pray for him. I obviously everybody who I thought was a genius involved in my campaign connected these people. So he's got Spencer, what's going to happen in this election now? If people vote, Steve wins. But people need to vote. It's like you think that you think there's still an opportunity to vote in the state versus having the machine fill it out for me? Correct. I, I is, I'm a, I'm so optimistic. Psych. No, I mean, you just gotta be, you gotta, we gotta try. People need to vote. And I don't think the, the machine and the idea that we can't win should stop from trying. (00:38:00) If I had thought that way, I mean, I had my plan. I would 100% bend the mayor. I didn't know they were going to pull what they pulled that soon. I thought they were going to wait till November. So I had the plan to win, but I'm going to save it for my next election. So, you know. What, what, what does that, what does that mean exactly? Well, I mean, behind off stage, I can tell you, you know, I can't give the DSC. Basically, you need a better vote stealing operation than they have, right? What I've learned is it's not stealing, it's legal. Right. I got my own plan now. I got my own plan now. All of harvesting, they call it. Yeah. You know, I got something up my sleeve. Well, no, no. In seriousness, Spencer. He is being serious. I am dead serious. Okay. So, you have legal recourse. (00:38:48) Voter fraud is a very significant crime. People have been prosecuted very regularly for committing voter fraud. You're making these claims. Freeberg's making these claims. You're piling on. What claims? Hold on. What claims did I make? You just said if you can actually win or that somebody automatically signs it for you. You're insinuating that the system is corrupt. Let me finish my question. That's not a claim I made. That was a joke about them. Okay, fine. But in our private chat. We're allowed to interview? In our private chat. You say all the time. No, I'm joking. I'll totally insinuate it. I'll assert it. Anyway, the point is. The system is corrupt. It's statistically impossible. We all saw the lines. Here. Here. Okay. But hold on. Let me. I know where this is going. Everyone says, well, why didn't you? Why didn't you investigate? Da, da, da, da, da. So obviously I got the top law firms. I'm like, yeah, we're going to get them. (00:39:33) And then you ready for this? The second those mail-in ballots get to where they count the votes. Because they say, come down here. Check this out. The second they get there. You know what they do with the ballots? They separate them from the envelope. So let's say I know 42,000 of these were cooked with the NGO, drug addicts, and the people that are paying them billions of dollars because they want that money to keep. I know it's all from there. Oh, well, we can't connect those ballots to those envelopes. We separated the chain of custody from those. So the certification signature is on the envelope, to be clear. It's like right there. So you, so I know, let's say I know this DSA terrorist commie person signed all these. I know that's this one. They go, and this is where they're from. Oh, we don't have that person's signature to connect those ballots. So you can't, I could have definitely said, I want to recount. (00:40:21) You can't audit is basically what you're saying. And they would have recounted the same ballots. So I'm not alleging anything. This is just a fact in California. This is what I mean by the machine case. Okay, so I didn't get to ask my question. Because this is legal, and the way it's set up legally is what makes it impossible to intervene unless you are willing to go play that game where you're now going to go collect all the ballots from the apartment buildings and fill them all out and get someone to put a happy, smiley face on it and be like, here you go. So that's the mechanism that ultimately I think the other side is going to end up having to employ if they actually want to get people elected in a state that's two-thirds one side of the aisle. So President Trump did 60 of these lawsuits when he lost last time and claimed the same thing. All 60 he lost. You're not even willing to do a lawsuit. But is your contention that you lost because of fraud? (00:41:08) Yes or no? It's a trick question. Well, no, it's a simple question. It's a trick question. Without evidence, I would say no. Okay. So the thing is he can't collect ballots. So if I had the evidence, I would tell you I would be the mayor right now. Okay. Well, what I would say is that on an election night, you were the clear number two. And then a week later, you had been narrowly displaced by a bunch of ballots that were counted out. Yeah. It seems like there would have to be, in this case, correct me if I'm wrong, tens of thousands of faked ballots. No, I'm not saying fake. This is where, this is again. It's not fraud, Jason. It's that they're following the law that was created to let them do what they're doing. (00:41:55) It's legal. Why is voter ID illegal? All right. So watch this. Watch this. Watch this. I'm in favor of voter ID, to be clear. But you still haven't explained where the crime occurred here. Watch this. The crime. Go ahead. Ready for this. I'm awake now. All right. Here we go. So if I go up to you when you go to like a basketball court to vote, you know, with the nice people and they say in California, they say, don't show us your ID. You, that's illegal. Those people, if I go up to you and I'm wearing like Mayor Pratt hat and I say, who's on your ballot? You, this is why you should vote for Spencer Pratt. This is electioneering. This is illegal. It's illegal. But it's not illegal for DSA commies to ride around on their bikes and to go into your apartment building, knock on your door, say, hey, this is your ballot. (00:42:43) You got to vote for Nithya Raman. She's going to make everything cheap, give you free money, a cell phone. She's going to pay for your Netflix. All these things. Fill it out. We'll take it in. This is, would be illegal at the gym, but it's not in California with ballot harvesting. So what these DSA soldiers, these are sold, these are true believers do. They do it in New York. They're doing all of it. They go around thousands of them and they go get these ballots. So they're not fake ballots. Yes, it's ballot harvesting and they can, people pay these people. I did legal ballot harvesting. You just can't pay them per ballot. And this became law, legal in California. How many years ago? Like a decade ago? Now the claim is, so I understand. I just want to make sure I understand the claim. The claim now is that DSA soldiers went, gave money to people and convinced them to place (00:43:34) their vote and then brought their document in. They're not giving anyone. Will you let him answer, Freeberg? The DSA operatives are being paid. Got it. And some do it as for free because they are true believers. Like people who knock on doors and say, I'd like you to vote. Legal door knockers. Yes. Half a million dollars. They knock and they say, Spencer's so great. And they say, no, I don't want to vote. And the door shuts and they walk away. These people continue. You go on the DSA website. They'll tell you, there'll be a whole breakdown on ballot harvesting. And they'll say, go back three times. It becomes harassment. Finally, somebody's going to be like, here, yeah, take this. Get out of my. So now the claim is the DSA is persistent and you weren't. You go one time, they go three. Just so I'm clear. (00:44:20) No, what I'm saying is it's illegal to harass people into who they vote. That's illegal. What the DSA does. Has any of those people ever filed a complaint about being harassed? Do you know where they're going? These people don't. You can't. I'm asking you. You're the one making this claim that you lost because of fraud. I also didn't. I said I don't have the evidence. You literally tweeted that the fraudsters stole the election from people. I said, no, I said 200,000 Republicans didn't show up and vote. Okay. So that's why you lost. There's many reasons to not win and lose in games. Also in politics. Do you think, do you think that the other side, that Republicans are going to start to employ the ballot harvesting tactic? It won't work. I did it. Unless you are nefarious, it doesn't work. If you are just like a genuine, like, hello, knock, knock, like, you like to vote? (00:45:10) Like, that doesn't work. These people. So tell me this. Talk about claims. Why won't California clear their voter rolls? What does that mean? Just to just. Yeah. Right now, the voter rolls, if you moved out of California, if you're dead, these are all ballots. There's an empty parking lot downtown LA that gets hundreds of ballots mailed to it. An empty parking lot. So people have registered to this address. Hundreds of ballots show up there. So back to your thing. These are fake ballots. They're not fake ballots. There could be potentially a million ballots out and about that now a DSA person could harvest, get these ballots, fill in a circle, and then do a smiley face as the witness and mail that in. So we can call it a claim or we could call it who knows. (00:45:57) It's like, who knows what's going on? The point is we need voter ID. People need to get that on the ballot. Yeah. No, I mean, you're the person who made these claims. So I'm just asking you the questions and for the record, I think if you hold on, let me finish. I haven't had this response since yesterday. For the record, I think if you have to show an ID to get on a plane, it's quite reasonable that you should show one to vote. So I'm for voter, but you also need an ID. You also need an ID to shop at Kami Mom Dami's new markets. So if you want, if you want Kami food, you need an ID. What are you doing next? Let's move on past LA. Oh, this is it. This is the. You're joining the show, Fifth Bestie? You know, I have Zoom. You have Zoom and you have time. I do love premium tequila. (00:46:45) This could work. This could work. Fifth Bestie. There's a lot of. I mean, Brad Gerstner is very popular, but I think you have a, we might need to move him to Sixth Bestie. What I will continue doing because I only ever ran for mayor to increase my message of fighting these people who have destroyed my beautiful state, my beautiful city. And then. And your home. My home. My parents' home. All my neighbors. Let me ask you a question about the incompetence of these idiots. They burn your home down because they can't keep water in the reservoir. And then. Have you been able to rebuild? What's the state of the Palisades right now? So here's the best part. That empty reservoir is still empty. And the reservoir across the street from my house that I was convinced I was, my house (00:47:32) was never going to burn. The one they didn't even talk about. That one's still empty. They have a hose. I just posted a video about this. They have a hose that comes all the way from Topanga through all the regrown dead brush. This is the hose now supplying the Palisades. But back to rebuilding. What happened is we all had farmers and all these great insurance, but, and I don't blame the insurance companies because it's our Gavin Newsom and our state parks that allowed the 60 years of dead fuels, dead brush to surround our communities knowing that there's no fire break. All they would have had to do, I talked to the top guy that does all the cutting of this brush, and I said, how much would this have cost to cut a whole fire break 300 yards around the Palisades? He said under $500,000 to save billions of dollars. (00:48:21) So back to rebuilding. Insurance dropped everybody because they were smart. They saw all this dead brush into every, it's illegal if I go cut. So if I'm, my backyard has Gavin Newsom State Park dead brush coming into it. If I cut it, those are protected milk vetch. You're going to get a fine. The LADWP got fined $1 million for cutting some dead brush around a downed pole in these state parks. So the CARB who's in charge of this, these people that care more about plants, they're also ruining the Federal Fire Service right now. And they're fighting, literally, the federal government to protect these plants again over people. So back to building. No, I won't be able to build until we win the lawsuit against Gavin Newsom and the state (00:49:08) parks and the city and the LADWP, which we are. What is the lawsuit that you filed? It's a mass tort. It's 10,000 victims for the negligence. They let, so, but people don't realize because they're not in the weeds or we should we say in the milk vetch on this. On New Year's Eve, there was a fire in the Pacific Palisades, eight acres. They put it out. The state park did not monitor that fire, which is in their state park manual, and they let it smolder leading into a known wind event that was coming on January 6th, January 7th. I've now had firefighter whistleblowers tell me that there was clearly smoldering coals on the side of this hill and now in the depositions with the state park employees. We have their photos. (00:49:54) They took photos of the hillside just smoking. And when asked, why didn't you do anything? They say, oh, we're not firefighters. So the state park is liable for allowing a dangerous condition to burn down the community. The LADWP is liable for leaving the reservoirs empty and having no water. And the city is liable. So basically, you're just trying to set the record straight, hopefully get back some recompense for you and these other families. But is most of it this first part of just like, make the record public of all of this incompetence and the hope that people realize that it doesn't need to be this way? That was initially why I was out making my videos and doing the content to help my community. And then when I saw Mayor Bass was just automatically going to be the mayor again, I was like, oh, no way. (00:50:40) And then I called Rick Caruso. I said, are you going to run or what? He's like, no. I was like, oh, it's on. So then I ran with the intention to just try to stop her from becoming mayor if that meant me being mayor. Honestly, people are like, oh, you have no experience. Oh, to enforce the law? What LA needs is a mayor that enforces the law. Neither Mayor Bass nor Nithya Raman have any intention on enforcing the laws because it doesn't look good. It doesn't look good if you tell the illegal food vendors that they can't ruin a small business that's been paying taxes for 40 years. Oh, you're messing with this community, this at-risk community. No, this is illegal. They're destroying this family's business. So these simple things that I would have been able to do as mayor that's unfortunate that (00:51:25) it's going to take four years of pure destruction for them people to call me up in four years like, let's go, and I'll be ready. Spencer, are you still doing content? What are you doing right now with your time? So there's three opportunities that are in play. And yes, content, what I realized when I got out of this is the media, and this sounds very potus, but the media just lies. Like, there's so many lies that I witnessed all day long firsthand in my city that was like, I need to be out here making content with the truth. It's not a, it's in the center. I keep saying to people like, oh, he's a Republican. No, the truth doesn't have a side. It's that simple. And these people across the country now are trying to destroy it. (00:52:13) They truly are. And when you start living this all day long, like me, it's not for LA now. And I'm like, damn, I got to fight for America? Like, I'm like, Jason Bourne? This is crazy. So yeah, no, I, you know, now I'm flying to New York and meeting with people in New York, trying to help them because I don't want New York to go down even worse than. I have a suggestion for you. What were the other two things? You said there was three things. Is that all three? No, there's three plays. I see. But I mean, I was going to be the big guy in AI as mayor because I was going to turn Skid Row into all just data centers. I mean, you're weaving, you're speaking our language. I had a, I actually had a call trying to like get the information about data centers with a guy that knows data centers. And he said, Spencer, do you understand this is the time for like a city like LA whose (00:53:03) infrastructure is collapsing into the ground to take private business and billions of dollars be like, hey, yes, you can put this data center where we have naked drug addict zombies and no actual human being can go for 50 blocks. We're going to put that here. But you need to redo our water pipes. You need to redo our electric. We can retrain the fentanyl addicts to be electricians. Metis got a program for that. You know, as I drove over here. I saw two problems at once. You know, there's a, I was going to solve a lot of problems. So that's the. Spencer, in real seriousness. Yes. You're incredibly quick witted and entertaining on camera. You should consider doing reality TV. You know, you know why I don't like reality TV and it's only thing worse than people in politics is there's too much image crafting and that's what makes a bad reality shows. (00:53:52) Now everyone is image crafting, trying to create a persona. What's going to be in the comment section? What are people going to say on the blogs? You cannot be on real. Like the last reality show I was on when they rebooted the hills. You were on a reality show? A couple, a couple, you know. You know, I am the reality candidate. Reality check. But everybody was just faking their actual identity. And now what's so funny is if you watch any politician, they're just a bad TikTok influencer. Like you look at Abdul Saeed. He thinks he's Alex Earl. It's like, what are you? Honestly, I just got to tell you, I love you. And what a mistake because not only would you have gotten some great s*** done, this would have been the most entertaining mayorship in history. (00:54:41) Well, he's got time. Yeah, you got to run again. He's got a lot of time. This is amazing. He's not going anywhere. Yeah, no. What's funny is I actually am way more of a threat to these people now because I have You're dangerous. Two years to really get into these communities. I suggest you torture them. Torture Karen Bass for the next two years. You know, Karen Bass is not our worst nightmare. And I will never say anything positive. Nithya Raman and the DSA. People like people do not get my Democrat friends do not understand what the DSA is. I keep telling them, go on their website. It's not a conspiracy. Read their website. And you tell me. Abolish the police. Yes. I mean, the list goes on and on. And this is what they stand behind. And then I used to call them commies. And it'd be like, oh, you can't call them commies. Now I'm like, that sounds nice. (00:55:28) It's a compliment to them. They're anarchists. Like gassing them up. Crazy. Ladies and gentlemen, Spencer Pratt. Wow. Thanks, bro. All right. Great stuff. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

本集资源与出处