特习峰会、贝尼奥夫：这不是我第一次亲历 SaaS 末日、OpenAI 对决苹果、多感官 AI、厄尔尼诺

Jason Calacanis (00:00:00): Alright, everybody. Welcome back to the number one podcast in the world, the All In podcast episode 273. It's a huge week. Saks is out. So we got to get Mark Benioff, CEO of Salesforce. Marc Benioff (00:00:11): I'm the only one left here. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:00:13): You're the only David Friedberg (00:00:13): one left. Marc Benioff (00:00:14): That's why that's how I made it on. David Friedberg (00:00:15): No software CEOs, right, to China? Marc Benioff (00:00:17): There's no software CEOs in China. Jason Calacanis (00:00:20): Interesting. But did you get the invite? What's your what's your status with this administration? Because you were obviously very famous for, you know, being a democrat on the left. Marc Benioff (00:00:30): And I'm not a democrat on the left. I never have been. Jason, bro. You talking about? Yeah. You don't you donated to Jason Calacanis (00:00:36): all these folks, and now you're Marc Benioff (00:00:37): kinda in Jason Calacanis (00:00:38): Trump's camp? What is it? Marc Benioff (00:00:39): Listen. The number one thing is, hey. I'm here to support the country. That's what I do. Okay. Yeah. Jason Calacanis (00:00:47): So you're right in the middle. You have, an allegiance to America. Marc Benioff (00:00:51): I hope so. Yeah. I'm not a democrat or a republican. You're an independent. I'm an American. Okay. I like it. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:00:57): Benioff got the invite to the two hottest tickets. He got the invite to Windsor Castle in Tales, and then he got the invite, when Prince Charles came here too. I saw. He was in Tales then too. Marc Benioff (00:01:06): And also we were at that Saudi dinner too. Weren't you there, Jamaf? Chamath Palihapitiya (00:01:10): I did not go to that one. Jason Calacanis (00:01:12): Alright. Well, we have a big docket here. The Trump Xi summit has begun. That is the number one story right now after a two month delay because of the war in Iran. This is the first visit to China since 2017. Seventh face to face meeting for Trump and president Xi. There are twelve hours, fifteen hours ahead of us today. Thursday was officially day one. Here's what happened. China agreed that the Strait Of Hormuz should remain open with no military commitment and that Iran should not have a nuclear weapon. So we're in sync on that. On Taiwan, this is a little spicy. She warned that, quote, if handled poorly, the two countries will collide or even clash, putting The entire US China relationship in an extremely dangerous situation. Polymarket says Taiwan is safe for 2026. Only 6% chance China invades this year on 23,000,000 volume, which is a lot of volume. 17% chance, roughly triple. That something happens by the 2027. There's been a lot of debate. Some people say it will happen after Trump is out of office. Some people think it's gonna happen while he's in office on trade. She committed to buy more soybeans, US oil, LNG, and 200 Boeing jets. She said the talks laid out a vision for constructive, strategic, and stable ties. Trump was effusive in his praise, for his friendship, giving the disclaimer that people don't like it when he praises Xi. Let's stop here and have a bit of a discussion. Friedberg, you, have been a bit obsessed with this relationship and the bipolar nature of it. What are your thoughts here, and what is the goal for Trump? What is winning for Trump coming out of this? What is winning for Xi? David Friedberg (00:03:11): I mean, Xi made comments in his opening remarks that it would be ideal if The United States and China could avoid the Thucydides trap, which as you'll recall, we talked about with Graham Allison, and we've talked about several times over the last few years that as a a rising power meets a kind of declining power, there's always some moment where you end up in this kind of state of conflict. And the question is, can The US and China avoid conflict and find a path to cooperation, which has happened a few times in history when we found ourselves in this moment, but doesn't often happen. And I think the way to kinda think about the opportunity is if you're in a resource expansive world where you're increasing productivity and increasing production globally at an accelerating pace, perhaps there's less of a reason to have conflict. Perhaps there's a way that both societies, both countries can increase the quality of life for their people without taking it away from the other side. And in a world where you're more resource constrained or resource static, that becomes less possible. You have to fight and grab land and grab territory and grab resources from the other side. And it seems like in this moment when we are seeing these extraordinary technology shifts unlocked by AI and automation and biotech and all of these kind of moments of which could be true abundance ahead of us, it seems like the perfect moment to say, hey. Maybe the world can be more multipolar. It doesn't need to be unipolar. It doesn't need to be bipolar, but everyone can participate in the expansion of the pie. And I think that that's kind of the idealistic way to look at the opportunity in front of the administration and Chinese leadership right now. Is there a way to kind of look at the next thirty years and ask the question, how do we all share proportionately in growing the pie and not find ourselves in a moment of conflict where we assume the pie is static? That's, I think, hopefully, the message that comes out of this. From an administration political perspective, it just seems like this is gonna be a major coup for the president if he can walk away with a series of trade deals with China that increase job security, increase prosperity, increase income levels, increase investment in America and American jobs, it would be a huge win. And I think that's the tactical stuff that people will be truly looking for. David Friedberg (00:05:34): And I think the big strategic question, which I care most about, which is avoiding conflict, is there a way we can chart an economic and cooperative path that doesn't involve eating each other and involves sharing in a bigger pie? Jason Calacanis (00:05:45): Tramath, why is Trump bringing all of these CEOs with him, and what does success look like, coming out of this meeting? Chamath Palihapitiya (00:05:53): I think that you find a resolution and a path forward with China through economic cooperation. It's the largest consumer economy in the world. It's still largely closed off. And so I think what this is was about bringing some amount of financial firepower with them so that they could start to penetrate that market. Planes, cars, chips, you know, very much hard equipment type stuff. I've said this before, but I think the Chinese are very much a top down Confucian societal philosophy, whereas Americans are much more bottoms up kind of an individualist construction. The fact that we're so different actually gives us a lot of room to find cooperation and not find conflict. And I think at the center of that is economic cooperation. I had a friend call me this morning, very prominent democrat. And, you know, he was the one that called out the media, which I was surprised by. And he said, you know, the media gets it all wrong because they're talking about why is he bringing these CEOs. And instead, the reality is that the simplest and surest path to a no conflict detente with China is economic entanglement. And it has to be bidirectional because really for so many years, it's been one way where they're sending us the cheap goods that they wanted. So I think strategically, it's good. And I think, you know, I'll just take a slightly different take on what Friedberg said. I think behind closed doors, they're probably just figuring out how to divide the pie. Jason Calacanis (00:07:21): Unpack that for a second. Divide which pie? The the globe, the economy, the the Western Hemisphere versus civic? Chamath Palihapitiya (00:07:28): China still needs a lot of energy. They also need a lot of critical technologies that America provides. And so I think that there's a trade there. And the quid pro quo is there are certain regions of the world where we want them to deescalate their participation in, Central South America being probably the most important, and then the second is probably in the Middle East. And then maybe the third is just to find some reasonable view of the Asia Pac region together. And I think there's a trade there to be done. And in that, you kinda start to carve up the world into a pretty easily identifiable bipolar construction. Jason Calacanis (00:08:01): They also, Mark, need customers, to buy their goods, and we've had a bit of a, mixed signals there. Tariffs, obviously, last year, sticking it to China in a pretty hard way. The decoupling after COVID, Hey. We need to be independent energy, PPE, chips from China. Now we're kind of saying, hey. Let's come to the table and build connective tissue. So sort that out for us on a business level. Should the two countries be deeply entwined, and then how do we manage having too much dependency on China? Marc Benioff (00:08:40): Well, you heard it today from president Xi when he said he wants a wider door. And that means that he wants the door of business to open even wider between the two countries. We have our absolute best salespeople there, not just our president who has to be one of the best salespeople I've ever met, but also we've got Elon. We've got Jensen selling chips. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:09:04): Kelly Ortberg selling planes. Marc Benioff (00:09:06): Kelly is selling planes. He's already sold 200. He wants to sell Jason Calacanis (00:09:09): financial services. Yeah. Marc Benioff (00:09:10): Brian is selling soybeans. Brian Sykes, the CEO of Cargill. You know? Cargill is the world's largest private company based in Minneapolis, and he is gonna come away selling a lot of soybeans. So we have a you go through the list of the CEOs. Each one is our best salesperson in this category, and they're gonna come back with orders, and it's gonna be amazing. And by the way, I think you said it very well. You know, this idea of business is this kind of greatest platform for change. They are working together like never before. Don't forget, this isn't Trump's and Xi's first meeting. These guys really like each other. They are very connected together. You can see they're smiling with each other. They're very they have a sales orientation. So I expect a lot of order books to come back. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:09:56): I have a question for you. Are you allowed to sell software in China? Marc Benioff (00:10:00): We well, with the right the Chinese have a lot of data residency laws. So, you know, we we do it as we don't have any offices or employees in China. We never have. The only time we end up with any residue in China is when we buy a company, and they have a presence over there, and then we have to divest from it. We have an exclusive partnership with Alibaba. Everything just goes through them, and we we don't do anything in China. Jason Calacanis (00:10:26): Is it significant growing? Is it what percentage of your revenue is it? Marc Benioff (00:10:30): Yeah. It's it's great. You know, we have it's a great partnership. Key customers of Salesforce like Louis Vuitton, you know, or Laura Piana. I know Chamathla's Laura Piana. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:10:40): Yeah. And, you Marc Benioff (00:10:41): know, Laura Piana sells a lot of sweaters in China. And then, you know, in all other stores all over the world, they use Salesforce. But in China, it's Salesforce on Alibaba. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:10:52): It's still your code, but then it resides in their servers for data residency stuff. Marc Benioff (00:10:57): Their data residency, their their partnership, it's a totally unique relationship. It's the only place in the world that we do such a thing. Jason Calacanis (00:11:05): Yeah. And it has to be all the data has to be kept in China. All the data has to be accessible by the CCP. That's why it's Marc Benioff (00:11:12): so extraordinary, by the way, what Elon has. You know? Elon has Tesla in China. No partnership. He's the only one. He has a phenomenal relationship with Xi. When you look at Xi and Elon together, notice how deferential and respectful they are of each other. And here is these AI cars with all these cameras, American made, you know, Chinese factories driving around China. That is pretty incredible. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:11:42): How do you think he pulled that off? Is that just a one off exception? Marc Benioff (00:11:46): I think Elon's the greatest salesman in the world. That's how. Jason Calacanis (00:11:50): I mean, the cynical take on it, Chamath, would be they wanted him there, and they wanted to study the company and the innovation. And they have now become the biggest competitor with their EVs. And so it is a pretty coopetition, I guess. It would be the cynical way Marc Benioff (00:12:07): to I want one of those new BYD golf, you know, what do you call those? The doors that flip flip up. Gullwing. Gullwing. I want one of those Gullwing BYDs. They have some cool cars. Have you seen those? Jason Calacanis (00:12:20): They're cool, but they're not safe. David Friedberg (00:12:21): They're incredible. Marc Benioff (00:12:22): Yeah. They're talking in this in this they they said they're talking about bringing some of those cars to The US. That would be incredible. Jason Calacanis (00:12:29): I would hollow out the entire automotive industry here if we had $20,000, $30,000 cars from China. It would be the end of The US automotive industry overnight. And, Tim Cook's there. He has to store all his data there. That's been a pretty controversial issue for him because, Friedberg, if anybody has private information or is a dissident, Tim Cook has to give that data over to the Chinese Communist Party. How do you think this plays in America vis a vis the midterms, Friedberg? Americans feel ignored inflation over 3%, and they look at the Iran war as a betrayal by president Trump, and they look at China as not material to their well-being. So when you look at Trump being on a six month timeline for the midterms, and he's only got two more years in office after that, You got Xi who's working off of a hundred year playbook. How does that dynamic play out with Trump and the midterms and his core constituency MAGA, which is now evolving into America first, America only, and this kinda is is rubbing that group of people the wrong way. David Friedberg (00:13:45): I think the second and third order effects of anything that comes out of China is what's gonna be most consequential to the average voter, which is job security and income security and income growth, and then cost of living impact. The cost of living impact would be if there can be some deflationary effect from a trade deal that makes access to goods lower price for Americans. And then anything that America is exporting, there's increased demand. Like, there's a follow on effect to the soybean export market. There's a follow on effect, obviously, to the oil export market. There's a follow on effect to, for example, technology and software being exported. So that increases economic productivity in The US and increases job security income. And then the the other side of the trade deal is can we get stuff that Americans really care about and make it cheaper? Can people now buy stuff at the store that drops in price by 40% where we've kind of tariffed and reduced trade? That increases the price of things. So if those deals kinda get worked out, people will see things get cheaper at the store, and they'll feel good about kind of their income security, and I think that could be positive. I think that's what's ultimately gonna make people make the blue red decision when they go to the polls in November. Jason Calacanis (00:14:56): That's the schizophrenic nature of this, Chamath. We have Americans who very much want cheap goods from China, And then we have last year all these tariffs being put on, and we have this great decoupling. So how do you handicap the midterms, Trump's timeline, and Xi's timeline and what their goals are? And then, I guess, we'll get to Taiwan after that. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:15:20): I don't know. It's I think it's a little bit above my pay grade. But what I will say is that the midterms, think, are probably gonna swing more based on these recent gerrymandering rulings from the Supreme Court and what happened in the Virginia Supreme Court and what's gonna happen in the state legislatures of these red states and some of these blue states more than what's going to come out of this summit with with president Xi. So let me just put that over here. And I think that money is getting organized. There was an article in the New York Times this week, which really surprised me, but the largest donor in the in this election cycle is Andreessen Horowitz. Jason Calacanis (00:15:58): Yeah. What is that about? Yeah. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:16:00): I think it's because they're they're trying to establish themselves as part of the financial firmament of America, which I think strategically as a business makes a lot of sense. Like, they're in the AUM business. Right? So they can't stop at a 100,000,000,000 of AUM. They're marching towards a trillion. They're going to be the next Blackstone, which I think is an incredible feat. And they're building a juggernaut of a business. But I think they also realize that politics is now a permanent part of that if they're going to be investing in higher quantum, more geopolitically influenced parts of the capital cycle and parts of the economy. So I think the midterms are largely that. The money that's gonna be raised plus the gerrymandering that will get done and undone over the next few months. Again, I think I think the the Chinese and the and the Americans have a very strong incentive to kind of divide up the world. Like, I think the future at this point, you have these critical resource inputs. China has a stranglehold. You have energy and intelligence, AI, where America has a stranglehold on one and an effective stranglehold on the other, which is energy. And I think there is a trade there to be done. And as long as you can negotiate what a reasonable give and take is, I think they're just going to find common ground. Like, does China really need to be in Chile and Venezuela and Panama? Probably not. Does America have to have an incredibly strong point of view about the Strait Of Malacca? Probably not. And so there's probably a trade to be done so that we can get their rare earths, they can get some more oil, everybody can be happy, and we can all find abundance. Jason Calacanis (00:17:40): Yeah. The the key issue here is China is and most people are, you know, China phobic, but China has serious systematic issues with population, with their real estate, with their GDP, all of this is in decline. And I think Xi most of all is concerned about another Tiananmen Square. If he doesn't get more people working, they've had the largest growth of any middle class, you know, in history. They have the largest middle class in the world. I think, you were sort of referencing that, Mark, with luxury goods and luxury goods providers are going there. But it's tenuous. Marc Benioff (00:18:15): People the number one, by the way, that is the number one point of focus of president Xi. President Xi's focus has been getting 500,000,000 people from poverty into the middle class. Yeah. It's not exactly how we think about the world in The United States. That's the main focus of the political leader, and and he's achieved that. That that that has been an incredible accomplishment. Jason Calacanis (00:18:38): And but it's at risk right now because their GDP is falling. They need their factories to operate. They're being undercut by other regions. And then, of course, Taiwan is what they want, most of all and supremacy in, you know, their part of the world. Marc Benioff (00:18:53): I'm not convinced of that, actually. Okay. I think what they want. Oh, I mean, I think we just kinda said it to summarize. They they wanna have, you know, economic success. They wanna continue to grow their middle class. They wanna continue to have a healthy economy. They want more trade. I thought it was interesting that they're talking about Trump is talking about not only having the board of peace now, he wants a board of trade. That was a discussion we've never heard before today. Then, we have Xi saying, I want the wider door. Then we have all these folks there selling their products. Two people we didn't mention, the CEO of Visa and the CEO of Mastercard are on the trip. David Friedberg (00:19:31): Now why Marc Benioff (00:19:32): is that? Because if you look at, you know, commerce in China, it is dominated by companies like Alibaba and and these organization who use these super apps. It's not really all the way open for a Visa and a Mastercard. That would be incredible for those executives. So in the same way that we wanna sell airplanes, we wanna sell chips, Nvidia, the Qualcomm CEO, Cristiano, is also there. We wanna sell soybeans. We wanna sell payment services. We wanna sell everything. The more economic collaboration and cooperation you can get between the two countries, the more peace you're gonna have. You know, I David Friedberg (00:20:06): I think that is the reason 100%. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:20:08): I agree. Jason Calacanis (00:20:09): Three three hard questions, Mark. Should we be selling the latest chips? Yes or no in your mind? Marc Benioff (00:20:15): I think it's irrelevant at this point. I think that the Chinese models are as competitive as these US models, and they've learned to make these models without having the highest end chips. I think the highest end chips is kind of more of a ego gratification for us. We have Blackwell. We have this. We have that. But when you look at their models, their models are excellent. They fast follow us. You know? The best models David Friedberg (00:20:38): we have six months away now. Jason Calacanis (00:20:40): Should we just sell it to them since they're figuring it out anyway, Mark? Marc Benioff (00:20:45): We probably should just sell whatever we can at this point. Jason Calacanis (00:20:48): Got it. Marc Benioff (00:20:48): And I think that, as I said, I think the more economic cooperation and collaboration is better. And if you want peace, I think that this I think Taiwan, it's kind of an a novel story. Jason Calacanis (00:21:01): To that. Yeah. Friedberg, your take on chips. Should we sell them the latest chips? And then, Shama, I wanna get the answer to that question from each of you. David Friedberg (00:21:08): I think it's inevitable that they get there. I by the way, I do think this is one of the key aspects of this deal. I've said this before, but maybe Taiwan becomes less relevant to The US and to China as both China and The US Mainland fabs. So as we build out our own manufacturing capacity here in The US, and I know we've struggled and there are fits and starts and issues with it and whatnot, but the the TSMC facility in Arizona is running. They're printing. And if it works and they figure out how to scale it, there'll be other facilities in The US. And then China's main landing with Huawei standing up a lot of facilities. They've got a multi I think I talked about this on one of the shows, a multi deca billion dollar government investment in ensuring competitiveness, just with fabs, but also with semiconductor manufacturing equipment so that they don't get cut off on the supply chain with companies like ASML blocking sales into Mainland. So as they build out their own semiconductor capital equipment systems and their own fabs, does Taiwan really matter? Is there really that much of a security risk to The United States and to China in that sense? And perhaps what everyone's focused on, which is this pivot point around Taiwan, maybe it's not that The US is selling Taiwan down the river, but it's just that no one gives a shit anymore. So, you know, there may be this kind of cultural moment for China where they wanna, at some point, say, hey. By 2040, which I think is what I've heard, they wanna be able to kind of, you know, bring Taiwan fully into the sphere. Maybe The US shouldn't care that much at that point from a economic and security perspective. So I think that's that's one of the things that's happening that Jason Calacanis (00:22:42): you're in. The camp of sell the chips to them, and it will demotivate the TSMC or the capture of those fabs by David Friedberg (00:22:51): the Chinese. Put it this way. I think the more the global productivity index can climb, the better off all humans will be. So the question is, do you really want the West to see their productivity index climb, and then you're effectively forcing conflict and forcing issues with the East? Or if we all grow our productivity index, we all make more stuff, everyone benefits, everyone has better jobs, everyone makes more money, everyone has access to more stuff, the cost of goods comes down for everyone, Doesn't that make the world a safer and more secure place? Sure. So I think this idea that, like, technology should be held to one side of the world and not given to the other side of the world is inevitably gonna lead to conflict or increase the probability of conflict. Whereas if you let technology diffuse and proliferate, everyone benefits and conflict indices go down. Jason Calacanis (00:23:39): It's become commoditized, you know, and everybody has access to it, so then it it becomes You David Friedberg (00:23:45): give everyone a higher standard of living and give everyone's economy a boost, and you give everyone less reason to fight with each other. Jason Calacanis (00:23:50): You went there with Taiwan, should we take our arm cells off of the table, Friedberg? And should we ask China to not sell arms to Iran? David Friedberg (00:24:01): Yes. We should ask China to not sell arms to Iran. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:24:03): Yeah. David Friedberg (00:24:04): Okay. I don't know what there is what is there Jason Calacanis (00:24:06): to talk about there? Well, because I think what she wants is for us to not sell arms to Taiwan. So would you make that trade, I guess, is what I'm saying. David Friedberg (00:24:15): Oh, yeah. I mean, that's a good question. I think in that context, that that's a that's a nuance one. I don't That's why Jason Calacanis (00:24:21): I bring it up because that seems to be David Friedberg (00:24:23): Generally, you're right. Yeah. I mean, generally, that's probably a a a trade that, you know, that should be kind Chamath Palihapitiya (00:24:29): of a trade. Do the deal. David Friedberg (00:24:30): So you say make the trade? Yeah. Jason Calacanis (00:24:32): I mean, I I kinda know Chamath Palihapitiya (00:24:34): We're eighteen months from Taiwan not being an important moment of conversation the way it is today. Why eighteen months? Because we are at a point where we're probably one to two nanometers away from being able to do what we need Taiwan to strategically do for us. And so as we scale up our chip fabs, as we get more capacity, and interestingly, there are these orthogonal technologies being developed. I don't know if you guys saw, but Neuralink was showcasing now a machine that is literally operating at the almost nanometer scale to do the brain operations for the implantation all automatically. So when you have the dexterity and the capability mechanically to make these things, the real reason then is a very different one than what it is today. Today, it's economic. And if you take that off the table, I think we'll have a very different attitude to Taiwan. That's number one. Number two, sell the chips. And the reason we should sell the chips is we want NVIDIA to win. We do not want to give enough oxygen for Huawei to then all of a sudden emerge and have a version of a chip that works. And what Mark said is totally right. These models are catching up. They're almost at the same pace. So the more important thing, Jason, probably we should all agree is just like, let's have a reasonable KYC for how the models get used so that somebody in a basement doesn't cook up some bioweapon. Meanwhile, sell the chips. Proliferate. Let Jensen win. I'd rather he win than Huawei win. Jason Calacanis (00:26:01): Mark, I'm gonna give you the last word, but I'm gonna force you to answer a hard question. China sets up a blockade around Taiwan, and they decide they're taking it. Should The US defend it? Yes or no? Marc Benioff (00:26:11): I I've said this for years. I I don't agree with Neil Ferguson on that point. I think that this is a nonsense issue. I think China and Taiwan will reconcile. I think that well, first of all, I do wanna schedule though Chamath for that Neuralink next Tuesday. You did o'clock, we can drill your brain. Can I get you Jason Calacanis (00:26:30): What are you trying to do? Put some empathy into? I talked to Elon. He said it Marc Benioff (00:26:34): doesn't give me the Just drill right in. There's a and boom. And then, well, you can get hooked up. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:26:40): It is the craziest thing. Marc Benioff (00:26:41): I know. I got you scheduled at 05:00 on Tuesday, Chamath. So Tuesday, Chamath. Hold your hand if you're too nervous. David Friedberg (00:26:47): Yes. And and by the way, the Gideon failed. Had a hard literally, like, if I wanna work with Chamath, give a hike Marc Benioff (00:26:56): for an even better show. Jason Calacanis (00:26:57): Absolutely. It would be incredible. Yes. And I would laugh and I would David Friedberg (00:27:03): giggle. We could get into show tunes here. Free break. I know you're, Jason Calacanis (00:27:08): yeah, big on David Friedberg (00:27:09): on the Jason Calacanis (00:27:09): show tunes. David Friedberg (00:27:10): Only had a heart. If I only had a brain. Jason Calacanis (00:27:13): A heart, a brain, and what's the third one? Marc Benioff (00:27:16): If I only had a neural link. David Friedberg (00:27:18): You gotta give you courage, Friedberg. At the sphere. It was incredible. You haven't tried Really? It Yeah. Tomas was like, oh, do Jason Calacanis (00:27:38): something enriching with my kids or hit the craps table. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:27:42): No. I'll I'll be honest with you. I get a little freaked out in large David Friedberg (00:27:50): Like, groups of people? Genpis. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:27:51): Yeah. I get I get a no. Just just like when there's a lot of people, I get very nervous. Jason Calacanis (00:27:56): Yeah. Is this because of your newfound celebrity? Is this is that the issue, or is this just always going Chamath Palihapitiya (00:28:00): this way? No. I don't even wanna go there. I just have these bad thoughts of like, oh my god. What if something happens? How do we get out and, like Jason Calacanis (00:28:06): Oh, terrorist attack? How do get a Chamath Palihapitiya (00:28:08): TXZ? Fire. I don't know. But yeah. Really? Marc Benioff (00:28:10): Exactly. You have panic disorder. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:28:12): Panic disorder. I don't like these large spaces with lots of people. I get a little whinged out. Jason Calacanis (00:28:16): Anyway, your kids had a great time. David Friedberg (00:28:18): Great show. Marc Benioff (00:28:18): Tony Robbins lives very near you, Shama. Don't you think we can get that to happen? Jason Calacanis (00:28:22): Yeah. Let's get Tony Robbins in there to clear that blockage. You're not Tony Robbins guy, Mark. Why are you selling to Tony Robbins? Marc Benioff (00:28:28): I love Tony Robbins. I had him at my conference this week. It was incredible, He did incredible presentation for an Jason Calacanis (00:28:34): unlock for you your success. He claims to that he has you on the roster of $50,000 a year CEOs. Marc Benioff (00:28:40): I am the number one fan of Tony Robbins. So, I mean, he Jason Calacanis (00:28:44): percentage of your success is attributed to Tony's mentorship? Marc Benioff (00:28:47): Hey, if it wasn't for Tony Robbins, I don't think there would be a Salesforce. There you Actually, Chamath Palihapitiya (00:28:52): no jokes aside. Can you tell us like what, like what, like what were those big kind of blockages and how did you, how did he help you or how did you work through it? Marc Benioff (00:29:00): Just focusing on, hey, the questions, you know, the quality of your questions is the quality of your life. It's that insight. And just are you asking yourself the right questions? What do you want? What's important to you? How are you getting it? What is preventing you from having it? How will you know that you have it? Just no one had ever said that to me. And then it was just like clear to me. Wait. I need to write that down. Like, what do I really want right now? What is my point of focus? And that is what gave me motivation as soon as I got that clarity. I mean, lot of us do it automatically, but that's not where I was when I was a kid. That's for sure. Jason Calacanis (00:29:32): Did you run across the coals? Did you do any of that kind Marc Benioff (00:29:34): of stuff? Many times. Jason Calacanis (00:29:36): Really? Marc Benioff (00:29:37): Yeah. Of course. Okay. Jason Calacanis (00:29:39): There it is, folks. Marc Benioff (00:29:39): Hey. We can go together. Jason Calacanis (00:29:42): Absolutely. We had Tony on the show. I tried to get in there and understand his psychology, but he just had us do breathing exercises. Alright. The, All In Summit is happening again. Fifth year in a row. Wow. We've been doing this for a while. Allin.com/events, September. We'll have you back, Mark, in year six. But when you score so highly on a keynote, we give you two years off so that we can build up the anticipation. So coming in 2027, our guy Mark Benioff. But for this year, allin.com/events. Okay. Topic two, AI's impact. By the way, real quick, can I Chamath Palihapitiya (00:30:17): can I David Friedberg (00:30:18): just do a quick PSA? A public service announcement coming from free. Announcement? Yes. Nick, just pull up this link. This dog named Scooter needs a home. Goodness. Promise my wife I do this. Don't get don't get mad at me. This dog named Scooter needs a home. He's in Baldwin Park. Dog's about to die. Lives in Baldwin Park at the animal care and control. They're overwhelmed in LA. There are so many homeless street dogs that are being collected. They're all being put to sleep. Wow. Someone give this dog a home. Marc Benioff (00:30:43): Gorgeous dog. His name David Friedberg (00:30:44): is Scooter. Good dog. Link link will be on the YouTube channel. Thank you very much. Are you Jason Calacanis (00:30:48): getting a little emotional, Friedberg, about this dog being put down? David Friedberg (00:30:52): I just don't like these you know, all these street dogs. Like, they they didn't choose that situation they were in, and then they all end up kinda getting pulled in by animal care and control, and and they all get put to sleep. Kinda sucks. You're a dog guy. Come on. You gotta have a heart for this. No. I have a Jason Calacanis (00:31:05): big heart. Shammoth, it's $10,000 to keep these dogs alive for another week. Can we count on you for that donation? Chamath Palihapitiya (00:31:12): Any purebred white golden retrievers in that bunch, Peter? Jason Calacanis (00:31:15): No. They're just Just mutts. Marc Benioff (00:31:17): We have a cat that we got at the shelter, actually. Kind of a fun story. Walked into the shelter Learning so much. Looking for a cat. Of a sudden, we're in the shelter. This cat's, like, coming out, you know, my kids, and all of sudden they're, okay. We'll take this cat. What is this cat's name? This cat's name is Cloud. Cloud. That's our cat. David Friedberg (00:31:35): Wow. Absolutely. Jason Calacanis (00:31:36): Kind of Marc Benioff (00:31:37): a wild. Yeah. Though we have Cloud the cat. Alright. I like that. David Friedberg (00:31:40): That's awesome. Jason Calacanis (00:31:41): Alright. AI's impact on software rippling through the market. Mark, you're on the front lines here. Marc Benioff (00:31:46): Thank you for reminding me. Jason Calacanis (00:31:48): Yeah. Well, I mean, in pain and suffering are lessons. Right? I think the Buddha and Tony Robbins both taught us that. And the only way to the other side is through, as you know, Mark. So Salesforce down a whopping 37%, 90,000,000,000 losses for you. ServiceNow, 42% Workday, 45%. 180,000,000,000 in market caps been lost. And the assumption mark is that AI is gonna make it unnecessary for you to use Slack or Salesforce or HubSpot, whatever it happens to be, that you'll just ask your AI to solve this for you, and we'll all look at a piece of glass and have no actual software. The AI will just tell us what to do. What's your response to the fear, the criticism, and how are you managing this massive change internally? Marc Benioff (00:32:35): You're right. It's the saspocalypse. Yes. I mean, it's not my first saspocalypse, honestly, but it's the current saspocalypse. So we are all now drinking at Salesforce sabrilas. And, we actually have a pet sasquatch as well. Yeah. We're all a little more sassy. That's what I would say. That's number one. Jason Calacanis (00:32:52): You bring the sass to sass? Gotta bring Marc Benioff (00:32:55): the sass to sassy. You know? And then David Friedberg (00:32:57): You've always been Jason Calacanis (00:32:58): a sassy David Friedberg (00:32:58): guy. Yeah. Marc Benioff (00:33:00): And then number two is, look, the market is rerated. It's not a mystery. Everybody knows. You know, you guys have been talking about it for a while. I've been living it. So the market software market's rerated. It happens every now and then. There are cycles. You know, I've been doing Salesforce for twenty seven years, enterprise software for forty, and the market's rerated. So you mentioned HubSpot. They're trading at two times sales. I've never seen that before. They just had a great quarter. We saw a lot of great quarters. I looked at the top 10 major enterprise software companies. They all had great quarters, and they're all trading in two times sales. So why? Because of everything you just said, there's like, you know, hypnosis around AI and, you know, we haven't seen it show up in the numbers yet. If it shows up in the numbers, maybe people will be right. Right now, all we know is there's still a lot of enterprise software being sold in the world. Jason Calacanis (00:33:51): So you've been through this. It's not your first time. Marc Benioff (00:33:55): This is not my first sespocalypse. I mean, I remember the sespocalypse of twenty twenty when COVID happened and all of a you know, everything collapsed. There was the great sesbaco What's your strategy? 2000 Yeah. '16. What's that? Jason Calacanis (00:34:09): In in all sincerity, what's your strategy and how do you deal with, you know, your internal team? Obviously, they are compensated through, you know, stock, and this is headwind. And you have competition for employees from OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX. So how do you deal with, rallying the troops? And then how do you develop a strategy? Marc Benioff (00:34:29): Well, you're right. I mean, it's a lot easier to be a private company right now where you don't have to be rationalized by the public markets. If you're in the public markets and you get rerated, that's the reality of being in the public markets. And I think that for what I tell my employees, what I just told my employees is, look. You can't get drunk on the stock price. If you are, like, focused on today all the time and that is how you're getting, you know, your emotional state, it is not gonna work for you. You have to find a different anchor. So I try not to pay really a lot of attention to it. I'm focused on my customer success. How is our revenue? Look. We'll do over 46,000,000,000 this year, more than 16,000,000,000 in cash flow. We have more than 83,000 employees. These are the things that I'm focused on. What is the level of customer success that we're delivering? That's a really important I can't control the stock price. There's nothing I can do. And for our employees, they can't control it either. They they need to believe in the company and the quality of the success they're delivering to customers in the long term. And then you look at the market, you look at these other companies, not just us. They're doing great. And, I mean, I saw some great numbers, but it doesn't really matter. The market's rerated. Jason Calacanis (00:35:39): Well, you've got all that free cash flow. You've been great at acquisitions, so I'm sure you're Marc Benioff (00:35:44): I've bought some great companies, by the way. Everything's a little cheaper. I like that. Jason Calacanis (00:35:48): Yeah. Shammoth, what's your take on this? You've been pretty critical of the SaaS space in previous episodes pointing out, hey. How durable are these revenues? So what's your take? Chamath Palihapitiya (00:36:01): I think the low end of the market is basically finished. Think there there is no safe space. I think the high end of the market where Mark operates, where the large monoliths operate is quite safe, and the tell was this week. The the deployment company deal basically shows you what OpenAI is running into. So you have to put in $4,000,000,000 you get all of these folks, you gave them a 17.5% preferred guaranteed return. For what? Essentially to stand up a competitor to Ernst and Young, Anderson, Deloitte, PwC, Cognizant, etcetera. If you just look at that, that doesn't actually mathematically make that much sense if you look at what those companies are actually trading at. But why is OpenAI doing this? I think why is because at the high end of the market where all the action is, what people are finding is, hey, hold on a second. This is a lot harder than we thought. It's not like boop, boop, boop, put in a prompt and beep, bap, boop, it all works. It's not how Jason Calacanis (00:37:08): it works. David Friedberg (00:37:10): So I think we're little Chamath Palihapitiya (00:37:13): oversold. Now I think this consolidation and the rerating can happen in the opposite direction. So what is the opposite trade? The opposite trade is who has constructive net dollar retention, who has negative churn that's been really predictable, which is a way of saying who has the best relationships? Meaning they're inside the CXOs and the C suite, they have relationships with the CEOs and they're trusted. And they've been around for twenty years. Those guys I think are positioned to crush because eventually, Jason, the next trade that has to happen is when the public markets become a little bit less breathless about AI, and they ask one simple question. Okay, guys. You've spent $3,000,000,000,000 in the last four years. What is the ROI of these tokens? And what's gonna happen is they're gonna have to go to guys like Mark and other people and say, please sell my tokens. And that's the next shoe to drop if you if you had to ask me. So I think you're gonna see these revenues, which are, like, way out of whack, like the multiples on revenue, multiples on assets, multiples of they're not even multiples of EBITDA yet. Those will come way back down. And I think these go back up, and you'll find a balance. Jason Calacanis (00:38:26): Yeah. And you've, initiated what could only be described as an unprecedented massive stock buyback mark, 50,000,000,000? Marc Benioff (00:38:34): I think it's the one of the largest in history. Yeah. We were you know, we we wanna buy back as much as we can. And I would just say that, you know, look. At a high level, look. There's awesome new capabilities. Like, these coding agents are awesome. Anthropic is awesome. Like, I am gonna probably use $300,000,000 of Anthropic this year at Salesforce coding. Everything's gonna be cheaper to make. It's more efficient. I can do things that I just could not do before. I can go faster than ever before. I can implement my software and sell it at the same time. I've never been able to do that before. I can break through obstacles that I've had, you know, just by focusing because I have coding agents and humans together, working together. Today, I have humans, agents, and headless platforms all interoperating never before. So the opportunity for my own company and the efficiency that I have in my own company in service and support and distribution and marketing across the board is unprecedented. What I can do for our customers, unprecedented. And, you know, to that point, my gosh, have you seen Anthropic? I mean, it is a rocket ship that will not stop because you can use this product to do these incredible amazing things. And then in complement it with platforms like ours, it's, you know, it's it's it's impossible to describe what we're gonna be able to do for customers. It's gonna be awesome. Jason Calacanis (00:40:04): And never waste a crisis. You've been super focused on the efficiency of the company, headcount, share buybacks, and I'm guessing you're looking at m and a. So it's not your Marc Benioff (00:40:17): first time. Finished up one of our biggest deals ever, Informatica. I think it was 8 or $9,000,000,000. It's been in it's been awesome because none of this stuff works if you don't have context. You know, the AI is very probabilistic. That is it can kinda kinda figure things out, but it needs to be grounded in real data, and it needs to have that semantic layer. That means it needs to be locked down into the truth, into a single source of truth, or it just cannot work well. And so our customers want more harmonized data, federated data, integrated data. So we bought Informatica. Our customers want our apps to use those large language models to be able to provide not just automation to their employees, but also to their agents just like we just said. So, like, if you call 1800 no software right now for the first time in twenty seven years, you talk to AgentForce. Hey, AgentForce. What's happening? But then after it authenticates you and you get on the system and it doesn't know who you are, then boom. It'll auto escalate you to a human being who says, oh, I can see everything you've been doing. Oh, yeah. You just need to resolve this, this, and that. And so that trinity of the phone, the web, and the human being are all together. It's all made possible by this AI. We just could never do that before. That is awesome. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:41:36): Was it controversial, Mark, to make Slack headless? Was that a big decision, or was that a was everybody kinda mostly on board with that? Marc Benioff (00:41:43): Well, we were the first to you know, the way that our platform is architected and, Shammoth, you know it so well because you're coding you're coding agents and the company you're building can run right on top of it and build awesome stuff also. So, you know, number one is we were the first with an XML API, a SOAP API, a REST API. Now a CLAI API, MCP API. We always wanted to have a platform that had every API possible. And our apps are not hard coded where we had to cut the top off them. They've always be embedded inside our platform. So now we can stream our apps out through a new API called AXL, and I can manifest it into any large language model or device or anything. And it just works better, actually. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:42:29): I think that you know when Jack Dorsey wrote that memo, J Cal, and part of what he said is he he's gonna try to run his company by building a world model. Yes. My initial thought was, well, where is the context, Mark, what you said before? Where's the semantic understanding to create a world model? And a lot of it for a lot of companies is actually in Slack. Jason Calacanis (00:42:50): It's in Slack and email. Yeah. Those two places. Marc Benioff (00:42:52): I showed you that Slackbot, Jason. I mean, the thing is You're all done. Because you run your company on Slack, all your DMs, all your channels, we're reading that now through the AI, and we can tell you more about your business than you know because Slackbot is reading stuff that, you know Yeah. Nobody knew what was happening. And like, I'm using that myself, but I can then connect it into other things. So I have the ability to go into Salesforce and Google and everything. And so when I'm on Slackbot, I can ask it any question about my company. What are my top five deals? What do what are my employees upset about? What are the top three things I need to focus on? And then boom, I get the information because it has the data. Jason Calacanis (00:43:34): I think you should really look at making Slack more open and cheaper and getting more of that context because there are limitations in terms of getting your data out based on, like, which plan you're on. It's just too convoluted. But once I upgraded to the higher plan and, you know, it's whatever, six, twelve, 18 k for our small company, I was able to get more and more context to my OpenClaw, Plexity computer, and Claude. We and we're testing all of those. And today, I wrote literally before I got on the show a new prompt that is every two hours in our Slack, tell me what decisions are being made, who's making those decisions, and what you would handicap those decisions if you were my chief of staff, if you were a CEO, or if you were a board member, I created personas to now evaluate decision making going on. Just Marc Benioff (00:44:29): do one lens. The new version of Slack. You're gonna love it, Jason. And, you know, that OpenAI and then dropping and every AI company is standardized on Slack. Yes. And by the way, and our core sales cloud and service clouds as well. So I've gotta show you what we're doing. David Friedberg (00:44:44): It's so Chamath Palihapitiya (00:44:45): neat. I'll I'll sit with the Marc Benioff (00:44:46): team. So fun. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:44:47): What's your advice to let's say you were running a software company that was like before the AI wave and you're private. Right? There's a bunch of these companies that were supposed to go public, didn't go public. What should they do? Like, what do those boards do? Marc Benioff (00:45:00): What They Here's some Kleenex for them for all their tears. Because they're I mean, I talked to these CEOs. They're crying. What's my market cap? I'm not getting paid for my work. Guys, grow up. You know, that's what I love about the public markets. They rationalize everything all the time. So Yeah. Great. Be in the public markets. You wanna be in a private market. Your evaluation is fantasy land until somebody's actually gonna pay you. So I just tell them, hey. You gotta focus on your revenue, focus on your customers, focus on your cash flow, focus on your profitability, focus on your innovation. How are you gonna add value to your customers? That's what's really truly important. Jason Calacanis (00:45:39): Friedberg, any thoughts for me? We're doing David Friedberg (00:45:41): a big Salesforce implementation at Ohalo. And I I would say that one of my observations over the last six months, because we've talked a lot about using these generative tools, is we've kind of dropped all the vertical software, but we're doubling down our investment in horizontal tools. So we're investing heavily in these platform capabilities that then we're able to build apps and workflows on top of them that are specific to our business rather than try and buy an off the shelf app or workflow tool. So I think that there's kind of a really interesting moment right now where we talked about this last time. You could kinda discern between founder led and non founder led enterprise software. I also think that there's this kind of vertical horizontal shift where they're kind of trading the same right now, but you could probably break them. You could break that trade. So I think there's probably a good arbitrage there. Marc Benioff (00:46:28): Yeah. Right. I think everyone who wants to sell those potato sleeves seeds, you know, is gonna need some tools to sell them. But the thing that's kind of cool is, you know, we have 15,000 salespeople now. So they're out there selling these products like Slack and selling to David and so forth. But here's the thing that's interesting. In the last twenty seven years, we calculate somewhere between twenty and thirty million people. We didn't call back. We did not call them back because we didn't have the people to do it. So just this week, I called back 50,000 people, you know, just through agents so I could qualify. I just bought a company called Qualified so I can qualify the agents, call people back, the BDR, the SDR function. I can go outbound. I can do things I could never do before. That is made possible by this AI automation linking it then to the apps. You can go to another level. Jason Calacanis (00:47:24): Yeah. Okay. Breaking news. I wanna get everybody's take on this. OpenAI, in a breaking news story, is considering suing Apple over their ChatGPT partnership. As we all know, two years ago, Apple and OpenAI announced ChatGPT would integrate into Siri, iOS, macOS. But according to Bloomberg, the deal has gone so poorly for OpenAI that they might sue Apple for breach of contract. Here are OpenAI's gripes. Apple ChatGPT integration within Siri requires users to specifically say ChatGPT to get results. We probably all experienced this if we haven't given up on Siri, which is the worst personal assistant ever created. Apple hasn't it's to the level. David Friedberg (00:48:06): Just with this product. How do Jason Calacanis (00:48:09): you get there first and you remain worst? Apple hasn't promoted the integration at all, And users are still overwhelmingly going to the standalone chat, GPT app, or others. OpenAI expected billions of subscription revenue from the deal, and it hasn't come to fruition. According to Bloomberg, Apple's side of the story is, hey. They have concerns about OpenAI's privacy practices. Maybe they don't trust the guy in charge over there, which was a reoccurring theme in the lawsuit. And they're annoyed that OpenAI and here is the palace intrigue. They're upset that OpenAI is building hardware to compete with Apple and that they recruited their design guru, Johnny Ive. Mark Benioff, you Marc Benioff (00:48:59): know the Jason Calacanis (00:49:00): players. What is going on here? Marc Benioff (00:49:03): Yeah. And it's gotta upskill. Jason Calacanis (00:49:05): Sam Altman in OpenAI. Marc Benioff (00:49:07): I love him, but let's just upscale this conversation just one second. Listen. What has happened? What happened is we have these LLMs. They're starting to come come out. Every company's kinda chosen a slightly different path. You had Elon. He went out. He had Grock, and he kinda started building these companions and sex box and all this kind of stuff going on. And that was a huge focus of his, the sex bot focus. Then you kind of had OpenAI, and they're doing the sort of video thing, and they're also doing ad networks and crazy stuff like that. Then you had Gemini, and they have the Nano Banana. And then finally, you've got Anthropica, and they go, we don't know about those sex bots, and we don't know about Nano Banana, but we're gonna do coding agents. And it turned out Anthropic was right. And all of a sudden, the rocket ship took off, And now everybody's like, woah. Where did Anthropic go? Oh, woah. They're way up there. And then they're all like, we're all gonna do coding agents too. And now they're all resetting and gonna hitting their buttons and going, coding agents, everybody. Focus. Focus. Kill Sarah. Kill the this. Get rid of that. Check spots off. You know? Cursor on. Yeah. And that's where we are right now. And so everybody look. This is what's cool about right now is that everybody it's such a dynamic moment in our industry. It's so exciting that people have to pivot, and you have to be ready to focus and refocus and constantly ask the question, like, what do you want right now? And everyone is changing what they really want. And if you looked at where everybody was a year ago and where they are now, they're in a totally different place because we all know that when Anthropic four six hit, boom. Everyone could code in their companies. And before that, they really couldn't. Was a little bit of a productivity improvement, but not as much as we wanted. Now everybody sees this and goes, wow. This is unbelievable. Marc Benioff (00:50:58): We're even working on technology inside Slack to make it easier for everybody to code. So I think it's gonna be Jason Calacanis (00:51:06): really news. Breaking news there. Marc Benioff (00:51:08): You're gonna see some cool stuff with Slack and code. I'm not ready to talk about it yet. But there's no question that we are in a new moment in coding. I mean, Chamath's got a whole company around it. A lot of people have companies around it. There's gonna be before coding was all about humans, and, like, that's where I started. I was 15 years old, Burlingame High School, on hands on keyboard, writing video games, you know, basic 68,000, sixty five zero two. You know? No. No. Now it's like everyone Jason Calacanis (00:51:38): How does change your org? Is it the product manager, the developer, or the UX designer who's now the creator, or did it all blend into one? Blended together. Who wins? Who wins, Mark? Chamath Palihapitiya (00:51:49): It's all blended together. And by the way, to to Mark's point, the hands on keyboard thing, you know, most of our engineers just speak. They so it's like and so, you know, one of our guys just has a foot button operated thing, and they're just like Oh, Jason Calacanis (00:52:04): I know. Too. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:52:05): Yeah. That's all that's all they do. Plus. It's all talk. Pedal plus whisper flow and talking. There is no cans on keyboard anymore. Jason Calacanis (00:52:13): Alright. So let's get back to this story here. Marc Benioff (00:52:14): We're going for dolphin flow at Salesforce. Dolphins on keyboards. Jason Calacanis (00:52:20): Yeah. Mahalo for you. Ohalo. Freeberg, two questions. One, now that Sam has shut down the sex bots, how are you filling that void? And then number two, thank you, Shermon. And number two, what's your take on the strained relationship here between OpenAI and the world, and specifically the Apple world? David Friedberg (00:52:41): I don't know what to tell you. There doesn't seem to be a lot of long term partnerships with OpenAI. That's a very generous way to say it. What should Apple do? Should they just go back Jason Calacanis (00:52:54): to the loving arms of Google where they made a $100,000,000,000 being partners with them on the search default, your alma mater. David Friedberg (00:53:03): I don't know what to tell. I mean, look. At the end of the day, I think Google has a real opportunity to integrate a Gemini assistant into all of your personal information in Gemini and Calendar, your Google Drive, your Google Photos, where all of your personal information sits, it can become your your point of calendaring, your point of asking it questions about your personal life. Hey. When did I email this person, etcetera? And in the enterprise context, I think that's also up for grabs with G Suite. And so Google has a real chance to kind of own that assistant interface. Maybe Salesforce does too, Mark. Apple obviously has an embedded install piece. How many people are using Apple services for doing all of their mail, for calendaring, for storing their information? I think a good number do. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:53:48): Oh, yeah. One. David Friedberg (00:53:48): And so Billions. Yeah. So that may end up becoming kind of the way that the world silos out. It is like you'll have an assistant, but the assistant for it to be truly useful to you individually, it has to have access to all of your information, whether it's in an enterprise context or a personal context. Apple is probably gonna need to either build their own or white label with a partner. It could be Anthropic. It could be someone else to get this to really work. But but they're gonna be up against a formidable competitor is my point, because I think Google Assistant is gonna end up be being kind of a real kick ass product once they get this flywheel going. Jason Calacanis (00:54:18): Apple has the clearest path to becoming, you know, a top two or three player in AI simply by buying something like Perplexity or Mistral or or or some AI lab and then using their hardware footprint, which is extraordinary. I just got this MacBook with 48 gigs of RAM on it with an m five. It is unbelievable. And the new ones with the the studio coming out are gonna have a terabyte of RAM. They are gonna have a clear path to maintaining your privacy, running local models, and that's gonna solve people's problems. It's gonna be very easy to index all your images without giving the data to OpenAI, which nobody trusts, or giving it to Gemini. And that's, I think, a big part of why they picked the current CEO is because he's an engineer and hardware based. I I think the future of this is gonna be local models running on extraordinary desktop hardware. And if you have employees on this level of hardware running these models local like I have started to do, they become 10 times more valuable than the employees not running it. I I think I don't know. That's my choice for the next year. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:55:25): I'm not a huge believer in these local models. And the the only reason why is I think you want persistence. You have multiple devices. You have multiple persona. You're using a web browser in one instance. You're using a different computer at home in the other. And the idea that you don't have persistence that follows you around in 2026, I think, is a breaking feature. So I think you're not gonna lug around a five pound MacBook Pro everywhere you go so that you can get knowledge. Oh, wait. You're asking oh, wait. I got a diagnosis from my doctor. Hold on a second. I don't think that that's an You're right. David Friedberg (00:55:58): I that Marc Benioff (00:55:59): was your game on Jason Calacanis (00:56:00): the field. Marc Benioff (00:56:00): You're both right. Jason Calacanis (00:56:01): The game on the field, though, is you will, be able to use iCloud for this as well. So it's gonna be, you know, safer. So Chamath Palihapitiya (00:56:10): well, look. Give me your opinion on this. I think the thing that you're assuming is that these form factors don't need to change. And I just wonder, like, don't we have an iPhone moment that we're just all gonna be surprised by where somebody shows up and they're like, this thing, and you're like, oh my god, that's the thing. Do you know what I mean? Like, Yeah. There's enough There's enough ingredients here where somebody's gonna cook something up. And then you have to think about, Jason, the sunk cost of likely know, look. Apple is incredible, but that's the product of forty years, thirty years of meticulous process optimization. What do you do if the form factor is totally different and the nature of the device is different? How do you pivot that organization? Jason Calacanis (00:56:55): You're hitting on something very important, and it dovetails with another story on the docket. Mira Moradi released thinking machines new real time world. Chamath Palihapitiya (00:57:04): That was impressive. Jason Calacanis (00:57:05): And this is super impressive. And Apple at the same time has patented putting cameras into your AirPods. So you're right. And then I use this plug pin. I've talked about it before. These persistent hardware devices, the watch, the earpieces are gonna know your entire reality. They're gonna monitor your entire desktop, and this is gonna lead to a a use of tokens that would be a thousand times what user business users are currently using. Because the way mirrors and we should have her on the pod or at one of our events. The way her model works, Friedberg, is it's watching your desktop. It's listening to all the voices, and then it's watching your webcam all at the same time. And every two hundred milliseconds, it's uploading it to two different models. One is deep thinking and looking backwards, you know, at a maybe a thirty second clip, and the other one's in real time. That will 1,000 x the need for tokens if people are doing this for eight hours a day. Because it's not the turn based. Here's my latest prompt. Here's my question. I got a response. It's in real time, always querying an LLM, which is gonna require a hardware upgrade to the average desktop. Mark Benioff, what are your thoughts on this brave new world? Marc Benioff (00:58:18): It's one small step for man, one giant leap towards AGI. I think that you said it really well. I mean, the we are in the we've been so kind of think the LLM is the be all end all. We're gonna go to AGI. I don't really understand how large language models, which are only about language and words, and we know how it works. It's one word, one word, word, therefore, the next word is this, is gonna get us to where we wanna go to, which is minority report or Agreed. All of the science fiction movies that we've seen. But what we saw in and I think, Jason, you'd really articulated that super well, by the way, multisensory models. And multisensory models well, here's a good one. Oh, yeah. Me. I'm a multisensory model in a biological computer. I'm a multisensory model. I've got these eyes, ears, mouth, you know, work sometimes, some brain, heart, whatever, and some other things going on too that I don't even understand, and it's all running in this biological computer. I'm not exactly a large language model, though I do have one sometimes. So I would say that multisensory models are the next big wave for AI. And then but we're still not at AGI at that point. But those demos, like the demo of that model, that was pretty everyone should see, like, that David Friedberg (00:59:33): was Super cool. Marc Benioff (00:59:34): Pretty awesome. And then I think we can kinda say, where are we now on this on the path? But I think it every model company is kinda go, hold on. Pivot. You know, again, pivot. Like I say, pivot. Everybody's pivoting, and you're gonna have to pick your poison. And where where are you going next? Know? Can't And do everything. Can't do You Jason Calacanis (00:59:55): said you were spending 300,000,000 on tokens with Anthropic. Now imagine what this would do to an average, you know, employee if they needed a thousand times the tokens they have now. So instead of spending a 150 k in tokens, you gotta spend, you know, a 100,000,000. But you have some Marc Benioff (01:00:15): I don't think that's true. I I don't think that that I think we're getting brainwashed on that. Jason Calacanis (01:00:19): Okay. Explain. Marc Benioff (01:00:20): I think that's a mistake to think that way. See, I think we are wasting a lot of this too. So I'm, like, coding. Here's my I think I can convince you this. So here's here we're using $300,000,000 of Anthropic this year, and we're coding. We're coding. We're coding. Right? The vast majority of those tokens don't need to go to Anthropic. There needs to be some intermediary layer layer that's saying, oh oh, that one has to go to Anthropic, but these ones can handle by a smaller model. Jason Calacanis (01:00:46): So that can route it to the most affordable for Marc Benioff (01:00:49): the job to beat a mushroom. Early moment. You know? It's an early moment. And so David Friedberg (01:00:53): you're Concur. Marc Benioff (01:00:54): And I wanna connect back to what you said before, which was brilliant, Jason, which was the importance of the edge. Because the edge and the cloud are gonna come together. Okay? And, yes, you're gonna have more distributed intelligence. It's gonna work together. That's gonna make some ton of sense what you said. What Chamaz said was also completely right. You were both right. Then you combine it to this idea. Let's put it together where we're going. Yes. We're gonna have more distributed intelligence. We're gonna have intelligence on the edge. We're gonna have multisensory models. And, yes, you're gonna do coding, and it's gonna be more efficient though. So to think that it's gonna be always so expensive, that is just the moment of time that we're at right now. And I think there's gonna be a hot new company that's gonna come along and say this. I'm gonna sit between you and Anthropic and OpenAI, and I'm gonna make sure that they owe you only need their tokens when you actually need them. And that is not really where we are right now. Yeah. Does that make sense what I'm saying? Like Totally. You're like 100%. It was like, oh, I need a shower. And okay. Great. All the water. No. No. No. I just need some water. I don't even need all the water. Yeah. Okay. Jason Calacanis (01:02:05): Alright. Listen. We have two final topics here. We can talk about anthropic unrolling, the dark SPVs, and the impact that has on the market, or we can go to everybody's favorite science corner. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:02:18): I'll do both. Just do a quick around the around the neighborhood. Jason Calacanis (01:02:21): Yeah. Okay. Lightning round on we'll we'll do SPBs last. Freiburg, what do you got in Science Corner? Everybody. All the all the Freiburg fans just destroy when we skip it. So let's get in good one. David Friedberg (01:02:32): Mark, do Jason Calacanis (01:02:33): you like Science Corner? No. Marc Benioff (01:02:34): You do. I do. Come on. Yeah. Only if it's not the oceans. Jason Calacanis (01:02:38): Mark is the greatest salesman in Silicon Valley. He loves it all, and he wants David Friedberg (01:02:42): to hear more. Mark, how did you learn sales? How do we become half as good as you? Marc Benioff (01:02:48): I'm not a good sale. I'm like a I'm a a geek. David Friedberg (01:02:52): You are. Jason Calacanis (01:02:52): But you and I had a Marc Benioff (01:02:53): nice at a Tony Robbins seminar. Let's go. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:02:55): Okay. Marc Benioff (01:02:55): Walk over the coals together. Let's roll. Jason Calacanis (01:02:57): Going to Tony. We put out the coals. We're walking across them. David Friedberg (01:03:01): Nick, let's pull up the first chart. This science corner is about the dreaded El Nino season that is coming up. And so this is a forecast for sea surface temperature anomalies. And, basically, what this means is that the ocean at this point has heated up so much that there's now a forecast on ocean temperatures that are gonna exceed anything we have seen in recent history. So we're kind of looking at temperatures that might be four degrees above normal. That doesn't sound like a lot, but let's just look at this image. That top image is the sea surface temperature anomaly. That means how different the sea surface or the the ocean temperatures are. Why does that matter? And this is compared to 1877 when we had the biggest El Nino year ever, and I'll explain what that means in a moment. But why does this all matter? The reason is the oceans are the battery of weather. What happens at one part of the year is that the oceans absorb heat energy, And absorb, absorb, absorb gets hotter and hotter and hotter, and then that heat energy is released into the atmosphere. And then the atmosphere drives the weather events that happen all over the world, and it becomes somewhat predictable that you can estimate what the weather over the next year is going to be like based on how the temperatures are sitting in the ocean today. And at this point, there is so much excess energy stored up in the oceans. I'll give you guys a statistic. It's about 11,000,000 terawatt hours. The whole planet Earth uses 25,000 terawatt hours in a year. So 11,000,000 extra terawatt hours of energy is currently stored up. That's five hundred years worth of human energy in this ocean. And over the next few months, that energy is gonna be released into the atmosphere. And that will absolutely 99% confidence that will make the upcoming year the hottest year on record by far that humans have ever experienced, or at least that we've experienced in recent history where we didn't have data going going back a long time. It changes the trade winds, which changes how a lot of the weather evolves from a normal season. It changes the moisture in the atmosphere in certain parts of the world. And I'll just give you some highlights of what this means over the coming year. David Friedberg (01:05:10): There will be major atmospheric river events where you just get water dumped on you in the Southwest and California and the Gulf Coast. You'll have very low snowfall and very high heat waves in the Northern part of The US going up to Canada. You guys remember all those fires couple years ago in Canada. Interior regions of The US, like in Phoenix and and so on, they're already seeing temperatures at a 106 degrees in May. A super El Nino, like is forecasted for this year, could extend that duration of these heat domes, which could create temperatures that we've never seen in those areas. Southern Argentina, Chile, Brazil could see record shattering heat waves. And this is where things start to get a little nasty because when that happens, the crops start to fail. And in many parts of the world, Brazil, India, Australia, these are critical local consumption for large populations, but also major ag export markets. So if Brazil's crop fails, if Australia's wheat crop fails, Australia's wheat crop goes to places like Indonesia and The Philippines. Hundreds of millions of people depend on that that wheat crop. Hundreds of millions of people depend on the exports out of Brazil. Brazil's the world's largest ag exporter. And the scariest one of all is if the monsoons fail, which is now a very high probability event in India. 150,000,000 farmers in India that depend on their agricultural output or they don't make any money, they can't survive, and one and a half billion people that depend on that food. So the importance of this El Nino event goes beyond just like an interesting weather anecdote. But if you think about the second and third effects of this over the next year, you could see energy prices spiking and electricity spiking and the grid failing in parts of the Southwest, commodity prices spiking all over the world. And then you would see places like, India, The Philippines, Vietnam starting to face some sort of unrest if there isn't enough food supply that's coming into those markets. And then the question in India is a really nasty one because there isn't a really good solution. India and markets like it that are significantly dependent on having their monsoon event, but also are currently facing a shortage of nitrogen based fertilizer because of the crisis with Iran and the Strait Of Hormuz, which we've talked about as a double whammy. So over the next year in South Asia, you could see a calorie deficit and a major kind of economic crisis that starts to emerge. David Friedberg (01:07:25): So this El Nino event, I just wanted to kind of bring it up as an interesting science corner because the data now seems pretty confirmed that over the next few months, we're gonna have this record breaking El Nino, and these are the sorts of consequences that will play out over the next year. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:07:38): This is scary. Goddamn. What do you do about the the food problem? That's a big problem. David Friedberg (01:07:45): That's a big problem. And this is the commodity market's going wild for this right now. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:07:49): This did this happen the last time we had an El Nino? David Friedberg (01:07:52): Yeah. So when we have El Nino, there's a severity of these sorts of events happening. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:07:56): No. Mean Did we have a food shortage problem in the last El Nino? David Friedberg (01:08:00): Oh, yeah. When we have El Ninos, there's food shortages that come out of Australia, Brazil. You see these events. That's a regular part of the the thing. The problem this year is the index is so off the charts. It is so far beyond anything we've seen, and it's correlated obviously with the severity that it triggers a crisis that may be really difficult to manage in a lot of places. So The US is a net ag exporter. So from a US perspective, our big issues to worry about are the fire season. By the way, this does decrease Atlantic hurricanes. You're gonna have fewer hurricanes this year in the South, but, you you have these kind of major storm events that happen in California, the heat waves, electricity prices. We're probably more stable than other parts of the world. But think about the Brazil, the ag export market is such a significant part of the economy, and Brazil has a debt problem that this could end up becoming an economic problem in in some parts of the world, including Brazil. So the the commodity markets are trading this El Nino event pretty actively right now. It's become kind of a focal area for a lot of folks in commodity markets. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:08:58): Can your supersedes help or no? David Friedberg (01:09:01): That's a longer term solution. But, I mean, look, we're like at the end of the day, having it's actually a good point, but having genetics, a crop genetics that can adapt to a more rapidly changing climate is gonna be critical over the next couple of decades. That's a big kind of macro Jason Calacanis (01:09:16): for Another part of this, Friedberg, that as certain places heat up, they actually become viable places to put crops, I. E, Canada, or the Northern Part Of The United States. So we're seeing the actual places you can grow certain crops independent of genetic modification is expanding. In other words, farmland's expanding because of global warming. David Friedberg (01:09:40): Right. So we increasingly grow soybeans in Canada. That was not the case two decades ago through both plant breeding where we've made the genetics adapt, but also the warmer temperature, the shorter winters and whatnot. They've been able to grow that that crop further north. But if you guys go back a couple of years, there were major heat waves and droughts in Australia. Huge fires. Yeah. Huge fires. But remember that wheat goes to Indonesia. It goes to Vietnam. It goes to these countries with hundreds of millions of people dependent on it. And then they gotta go scramble and find it elsewhere. Now on a global basis, there's always a a bit of a give and a take. But in a year like this, when you have this much energy pumped into the atmosphere, you may not have the give and the take, and that's where things start to buckle. Jason Calacanis (01:10:21): Alright. So, David Friedberg (01:10:22): yeah, it's just like an early warning sign. I know I've given food warnings food crisis warnings twice before on the show. Gave a really Jason Calacanis (01:10:28): good one for Ukraine four years ago, and it turned out that that warning resulted in a negotiation to allow wheat to flow out of Ukraine that Russia, Ukraine, and other folks made a specific carve out in their war to make sure that famine didn't spread. David Friedberg (01:10:45): Yeah. And the fertilizer export was negotiated at the start of the war as well, which was critical. Yeah. For sure. But I think you played a role Jason Calacanis (01:10:51): in raising awareness for that. So I give you credit, dear Friedberg. Mark, thanks for coming on the program. Sorry that, at the end of the program, we all wanna commit seppuku here. But, you know, we have doctor Doom, and he he always loves to end the show. There he is. David Friedberg (01:11:05): Well, I'm coming from one of drama with an upbeat do you wanna wrap with an upbeat anthropic Jason Calacanis (01:11:10): Doomsday story or starring David Friedberg coming to the Marvel franchise in December. Yes. So you thought Robert Downey junior was playing him. It's actually Friedberg. Here's your meme. It's not Mark Benioff's first time here in this asspocalypse. Marc Benioff (01:11:27): There it David Friedberg (01:11:28): is. First time. Oh. Oh. He's like, I've been throwing this before, boys. I'm buying my stock back. Marc Benioff (01:11:35): Somebody cut that rope. Jason Calacanis (01:11:36): Yeah. Absolutely. Alright. Listen. I'll I'll just lightening around this one. Anthropic has had enough of the shenanigans of the multi tiered, multilayered SPVs being sold to dentists for 10% load in fees. I think we all knew this day was coming since it's becoming the wild west. They called out specific platforms and they said we're gonna negate them. Chemoth, tempest in a teapot or long overdue punishment for bad actors. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:12:07): Love. Mark said it right. All these companies should go public and get evaluation and and focus on the higher order bit. And all of these ticky tacky mechanisms that people can use to stay private longer need to get a bullet put in its head. And these SPVs are the worst. The layered SPVs on SPVs on beyond. By the way, I and I will guarantee you this. Once SpaceX goes public, once Anthropic goes public, once OpenAI goes public, you're going to see a litany of these lawsuits back and forth between the purveyors of these SPVs. They should not be allowed. They should be all negated if possible. Now you can't unbreak the egg, so I guess you just have to call it what it is. I hope every company adopts this, and I hope as a result, these companies go public sooner and they rationalize their equity structure faster. I think it's the right thing to do. So I like the fact that Anthropic is Jason Calacanis (01:13:01): Just pretty much say it. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:13:04): Well, it's not. I just I just think that you are gonna have a Jason Calacanis (01:13:07): lot of Yeah. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:13:08): No. Well, you're gonna have a lot of people that are gonna be very upset once the SpaceX thing comes up because inevitably, because it happened in Uber, somebody gets screwed in a layered SPV somewhere that they didn't know, and they're gonna be like, what happened? Jason Calacanis (01:13:19): Read the fine print. You're getting double carry, and you paid 10% on the load in fee, and you paid a price 10% over what the last round was. So it's a recipe for disaster, the fine print. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:13:29): Recipe for disaster. Jason Calacanis (01:13:30): Recipe for disaster. Hey, Mark. Great job. Thanks so much Marc Benioff (01:13:34): for coming out with you guys. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:13:35): Yeah. Come back any Jason Calacanis (01:13:37): time. You were great. Hey. You. Pete, there's a we have a fan question here. This is a fan question that came in written by your PR department. They wanna know when you do your charity work, or your innovation as a founder, are you more you know, at this stage in your career, you're known for both of these things. Are you more Steve Jobs or more Lorraine Powell right now? What your PR department worked very, very deep in question. They fit in. Marc Benioff (01:14:04): Yeah. Best decision I ever made, the best. When I started Salesforce, we put 1% of our equity, one percent of our profit, and 1% of all of our employees' time into a foundation. Today, we've done more than ten million hours of volunteerism. We've given away more than a billion dollars in grants, and we run over 50,000 nonprofits for free on our platform. That's just Salesforce. Every I every company should do this. It's amazing. Pledge1percent.org. That's my advertisement for the show. Everybody should jump on the one one one platform. Best decision I ever made twenty seven years ago. Irrespective of I've obviously done a huge amount of personal philanthropy too, five hospitals. Jason Calacanis (01:14:45): You just did one Marc Benioff (01:14:45): of those things. Jason Calacanis (01:14:46): You did one that was really, I think, personal. Susan Wojciechie tragically died of cancer and major You're Marc Benioff (01:14:53): gonna get me crying. Let's not go there. This is not your job. Talking about my best friend. Bestie. My bestie. Jason Calacanis (01:14:59): She was a special person. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:15:00): She's a star. Marc Benioff (01:15:01): The best. She was the best. Jason Calacanis (01:15:03): Just I mean, Marc Benioff (01:15:04): some I'm not kidding. You're I'm not kidding. Jason Calacanis (01:15:06): The audience what David Friedberg (01:15:07): was so unique Jason Calacanis (01:15:08): about Susan. Tell tell them what your it's a good time to do a remembrance. Marc Benioff (01:15:12): She this was one of the great people on the planet. Incredible woman, mother of five, amazing children, and two amazing sisters, great family. Everybody knows Anne, her sister, her sister Janet at UCSF. Sorry. My eyes are tearing up. I'll just tell you that, you know, she contracted a very rare form of cancer, passed away too young, a couple years ago now. And she was on our board. She was one of the great people of all time. I'm so grateful that her family is focusing on building a new foundation to go after this rare cancer. We're backing it. I think everybody should. Look. Everyone should try to be a Susan. She was one of the absolute greats. And She was. I have an altar in my office. When you come to see me, you'll see what the photos of her and me, and I think about her every single day. And, my heart just stays with her, her husband, Dennis, all the children, the sisters, the whole Wachicki family, amazing. And one of the great institutions in Silicon Valley, we're lucky to have the whole family. Jason Calacanis (01:16:19): Yeah. She was fantastic. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:16:21): Well said. Jason Calacanis (01:16:21): Alright. Well said. Rest in peace, Susan Wojciechiek. Marc Benioff (01:16:24): Thank you. Jason Calacanis (01:16:24): Alright. We'll see you all next time on the Love You Boys podcast. Love you, boys. Marc Benioff (01:16:28): See you guys. Aloha. Chamath Palihapitiya (01:16:29): Thanks for joining. Bye bye.